Table 5.

Multinomial logistic regression estimates (odds ratios) of partner choice among second-generation Turks

First-generation partner is base outcome	Model 1		Model 2
	2nd generation	Native	2nd generation	Native
Family factors
Human capital mother
Factor score	1.22*	1.44**	1.19*	1.36**
Human capital father
Factor score	1.14#	1.52**	1.11	1.41**
Parents grew up in rural Anatolia	0.83	0.64*	0.90	0.71*
Number of siblings	0.99	0.84*	0.98	0.84**
Peer factors
Contact to non-coethnic peers
Factor score	0.88#	1.60***	0.82*	1.53*
Percentage natives secondary school	1.49	0.46	1.75	0.62
(Percentage natives secondary school)2
Squared variable	0.95	1.12	0.92	1.05
Individual characteristics
Cohort
1970–1974	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
1975–1979	1.58*	0.61#	1.52*	0.62
1980–1984	2.64***	0.76	2.28***	0.69
1985–1990	2.46**	0.44	2.16*	0.39*
Completed level secondary education
No secondary education	0.61	0.26*	0.43**	0.16
Lower secondary degree	0.62*	0.48*	0.55**	0.38**
Vocational track	0.77	0.81	0.82	0.82
General/academic track	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
Context variables
Country
Sweden	1.00	1.00
The Netherlands	1.39	0.65
Belgium	0.69	0.58
France	0.86	1.53
Germany	15.7***	8.86***
Switzerland	0.93	0.55
Austria	0.78	0.64
Size Turkish second generation 18–35 years			15.53*	5.17
Multicultural immigration policies			0.16**	0.25*
Control variables
Man	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
Woman	0.13#	0.01**	0.17**	0.01**
Age union formation	1.01	0.96	1.03	0.98
Age union formation *Woman	1.08#	1.16*	1.07*	1.16*
Religious upbringing
No religious upbringing	0.92	2.29**	1.05	2.40*
Christian	4.76**	15.03***	6.90***	20.16***
Shia	1.08	2.52**	1.43	2.64*
Sunna	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
Observations	1,340		1,340
Log likelihood	−980.5		−1,030.8
R 2	0.21		0.17

^# p < 0.10; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001