Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 3;2012:936243. doi: 10.1155/2012/936243

Table 2.

Comparison of computational costs.

RMS h (mm) Assemble (sec) Propagation (sec)
σ = 0.5
 FDM 3.30e − 04 0.05 n/a 258.31
 FEM 2.31e − 04 0.05 0.20 248.26
 EFGM(cubic, d max⁡ = 1.5) 4.56e − 04 0.2 0.11 39.50
  EFGM(cubic, d max⁡ = 2.0) 2.60e − 04 0.8 0.05 41.33
  EFGM(quartic, d max⁡ = 1.5) 3.40e − 04 0.2 0.07 38.83
  EFGM(quartic, d max⁡ = 2.0) 1.49e − 04 0.8 0.04 40.60
σ = 0.25
 FDM 6.06e − 04 0.05 n/a 580.11
  FEM 4.60e − 04 0.05 0.21 591.42
  EFGM(cubic, d max⁡ = 1.5) 8.12e − 04 0.2 0.10 48.23
  EFGM(cubic, d max⁡ = 2.0) 5.80e − 04 0.8 0.04 50.90
  EFGM(quartic, d max⁡ = 1.5) 5.20e − 04 0.2 0.08 47.81
  EFGM(quartic, d max⁡ = 2.0) 3.00e − 04 0.8 0.02 50.90