Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 18.
Published in final edited form as: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 Dec 4;19(3):272–280. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.11.010

Table 4.

Comparison of joint space width (mm) and K-L score (mean ± 95% CI) at baseline and 18 month follow-up by weight loss group, after adjusting for age, gender, walk speed, ADAPT intervention and baseline value

Variable Weight Loss Baseline Adjusted 18 month P-value Overall (High vs No) Δ % Δ
Lateral Joint Space Width (mm) High 4.56 (3.82;5.30) 4.35 (3.89;4.81) 0.46 (0.50) −0.137 −3.0
Low 4.40 (3.75;5.04) 4.50 (4.08;4.92) 0.009 0.2
No 4.38 (3.69;5.08) 4.16 (3.79;4.53) −0.332 −7.6
Medial Joint Space Width (mm) High 3.17 (2.64;3.69) 3.12 (2.88;3.36) 0.67 (0.41) −0.120 −2.6
Low 2.99 (2.21;3.76) 3.00 (2.76;3.25) −0.240 −4.5
No 3.47 (3.00;3.93) 2.99 (2.77;3.20) −0.256 −13.2
KL Score High 2.36 (1.92;2.79) 2.47 (2.30;2.63) 0.44 (0.37) 0.149 6.3
Low 2.39 (1.98;2.79) 2.61 (2.45;2.77) 0.293 12.3
No 2.26 (1.97;2.55) 2.56 (2.42;2.70) 0.244 10.8