Table 3.
% |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prevalence |
Prevalence Ratio |
||||
Sociodemographic Variableb | 12-mo | 30-d | 12-mo/Lifetime | 30-d/12-mo | Total |
Age | |||||
Bivariate | 25.0 | 50.0 | 25.0 | 18.7 | 29.7 |
Multivariate | 37.5 | 43.7 | 18.7 | 37.5 | 34.3 |
Sex | |||||
Bivariate | 75.0 | 50.0 | 37.5 | 12.5 | 43.7 |
Multivariate | 68.7 | 50.0 | 37.5 | 6.2 | 40.6 |
Race/ethnicity | |||||
Bivariate | 31.2 | 37.5 | 6.2 | 12.5 | 21.8 |
Multivariate | 31.2 | 31.2 | 12.5 | 18.7 | 23.4 |
Parents’ education | |||||
Bivariate | 56.2 | 43.7 | 18.7 | 12.5 | 32.8 |
Multivariate | 18.7 | 31.2 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
Family income | |||||
Bivariate | 31.2 | 25.0 | 18.7 | 12.5 | 21.8 |
Multivariate | 31.2 | 18.7 | 25.0 | 18.7 | 23.4 |
No. of biological parents living with adolescent | |||||
Bivariate | 81.2 | 50.0 | 25.0 | 12.5 | 42.2 |
Multivariate | 81.2 | 50.0 | 25.0 | 12.5 | 42.2 |
Birth order | |||||
Bivariate | 37.5 | 37.5 | 12.5 | 37.5 | 31.2 |
Multivariate | 25.0 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 18.7 | 17.2 |
No. of siblings | |||||
Bivariate | 56.2 | 62.5 | 37.5 | 31.2 | 46.9 |
Multivariate | 37.5 | 12.5 | 6.2 | 18.7 | 13.1 |
Urbanicity | |||||
Bivariate | 12.5 | 0.0 | 12.5 | 6.2 | 7.8 |
Multivariate | 6.2 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 10.9 |
Region | |||||
Bivariate | 31.2 | 31.2 | 0.0 | 37.5 | 25.0 |
Multivariate | 25.0 | 50.0 | 6.2 | 31.2 | 28.1 |
Total | |||||
Bivariate | 43.7 | 38.7 | 19.4 | 19.4 | 30.3 |
Multivariate | 36.3 | 31.3 | 18.0 | 20.0 | 26.4 |
Each bivariate equation includes a single sociodemographic variable to predict 1 of the 16 DSM-IV or Composite International Diagnostic Interview disorders in 1 of 2 time frames (12-month and 30-day prevalence) in the total sample or in 1 of 2 prevalence ratios in subsamples (12-month prevalence among lifetime cases, 30-day prevalence among 12-month cases). This results in a total of 64 bivariate equations (each of 16 disorders in each of 4 time frames) for each sociodemographic variable. Each multivariate equation includes all 10 sociodemographic variables to predict 1 of the 16 disorders in 1 of the same 4 time frames, again resulting in 64 associations involving each sociodemographic variable. Sex is the only dichotomous sociodemographic variable. The others have either 3 categories (eg, 0, 1, or 2 biological parents living with the adolescent) or 4 categories (eg, residence in 1 of the 4 census regions: Northeast, Midwest, South, or West), which were treated as a series of 2 or 3 dummy predictor variables in logistic regression equations. The statistical significance of each association was evaluated using Wald χ2 tests with c – 1 df, where c represents the number of categories in the predictor variable. The entries in the table represent the proportion of times this χ2 test was significant at the α = .05 (2-sided test) level using design-based significance tests. While diagnoses of most disorders are based exclusively on adolescent reports, parent reports are used to make diagnoses of major depressive disorder or dysthymia, oppositional-defiant disorder, conduct disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The first 3 of these 4 were assessed in the full parent self-administered questionnaire (n = 6483), whereas attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder was assessed in both the full self-administered questionnaire and the short-form self-administered questionnaire (n = 8470). As a result, prevalence estimates of any mood disorder, any behavior disorder, any disorder, and number of disorders are based on 6483 cases.
See the text for a description of the response categories in each of the sociodemographic variables.