Skip to main content
. 2004 Feb;42(2):622–626. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.2.622-626.2004

TABLE 1.

Comparison of dematiaceous filamentous fungi identification using conventional methods and nucleic acid sequencing (≤1%)

Conventional phenotypic identification MicroSeq sequence-based identification (no. of isolates) No. of isolates No. of isolates with concordant resultsa Distance score avg range
Alternaria species Alternaria alternata (4) 5 4 0
Stemphylium/Cochliobolus (1)c
Aureobasidium pullulans Aureobasidium pullulans (1) 1 1 0.62
Bipolaris species Bipolaris spicifera (3) 3 3 0.00
Chaetomium species Chaetomium globosum (4) 4 4 0-0.94
Chalara species Chaetomium globosum (1) 1 0 0.94
Cladosporium species Mycosphaerella tassiana (3)b 4 3 0-0.23
Exophiala jeanselmei (1)
Curvularia species Pyrenophora semeniperda (1)b 1 1 0
Epicoccum species Phyllosticta maydis (2) 2 0 0.62
Exophiala jeanselmei Exophiala jeanselmei (1) 1 1 0.31
Exserohilum species Setosphaeria monocerasb-Bipolaris indicia (2) 2 2 0-0.62
Pestalotia species Pestalotia rhododendri (1) 1 1 0
Phialophora verrucosa Phialophora americana (1) 1 1 0.93
Pithomyces species Pithomyces atro-olivaceus (2) 2 2 0-0.65
Scedosporium prolificans Petriella boulangeri (4)b 4 4 0.94
Scedosporium apiospermum Pseudallescheria ellipsoidea (1)b 1 1 0
Scytalidium species Scytalidium hyalinum (1) 2 1 0
Phyllosticta maydis (1)
Sporothrix species Hypopichia burtonii (1)b 1 0 0
Sporotrichum pruinosum Phanerochaete chrysosporium (1)b 1 1 0.57
Ulocladium species Ulocladium chartarum (1) 2 1 0-0.031
Allewia eureka (1)
a

Sequence identification concordant with genus or genus and species.

b

Teleomorph.

c

The MicroSeq system could not distinguish between the two genera listed.