Skip to main content
. 2011 May;3(3):287–295. doi: 10.1177/1941738111403122

Table 1.

Reliability of the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS).

Author, Year Reliability Assessment Population Coefficient
Broglio,4 2009 Test-retest 48 young adults (mean = 20.4 years)
Generalizability (G)  Total BESS errors G = 0.64
 Men (n = 25) G = 0.92
 Women (n = 23) G = 0.91
 Total BESS: 3 administrations
  Men G = 0.81-0.89
  Women G = 0.79-0.87
Erkmen,10 2009 Intratester 19 recreationally active young adults (18-26 years old) 0.92
Finnoff,12 2009 Intertester 30 athletes
Intratester Intratester total score 0.74
Intratester stances 0.50-0.88a
Intertester total score 0.57
Intertester stances 0.44-0.83a
Hunt,18 2009 Intratester High school football players 0.60
McLeod,25 2009 Intratester Described as part of pilot testing and no demographics reported 0.90
Intertester 0.85
Riemann,33 1999 Intertester 18 Division I athletes 0.78-0.96a,b
Susco,36 2004 Intratester 36 recreationally active college students 0.63-0.82c
Valovich-McLeod,40 2004 Intratester 20 youth athletes (9-14 years of age) 0.87-0.98a,d
Valovich-McLeod,39 2006 Test-retest 49 youth athletes (9-14 years of age)
 Total BESS Errors 0.70e
 Males (n = 23) 0.75
 Females (n = 26) 0.61
 Younger (n = 21) 0.56
 Older (n = 28) 0.68
a

Range for all stances except double-leg firm.

b

SEM (errors) = 0.04-0.56.

c

SEM (errors) = 0.62-0.93.

d

SEM (errors) = 0.28-0.77.

e

SEM (errors) = 3.3 (values for subgroups not reported).