Table 2. Comparison with three proteasome cleavage prediction methods.
| method | Sn | Sp | Ac | MCC |
| ours | 61.19% | 93.53% | 85.45% | 0.5908 |
| PAProC(human proteasome type I) | 5.22% | 98.01% | 74.81% | 0.0849 |
| PAProC(human proteasome type II) | 0.75% | 100% | 75.19% | 0.0749 |
| PAProC(human proteasome type III) | 1.49% | 100% | 75.37% | 0.1060 |
| MAPPP | 94.03% | 16.17% | 35.63% | 0.1288 |
| NetChop(C term 3.0) | 97.01% | 9.45% | 31.34% | 0.1042 |
| NetChop(20S 3.0) | 67.91% | 40.55% | 47.39% | 0.0753 |
Sn: sensitivity.
Sp: specificity.
Ac: accuracy.
MCC: Matthews's correlation coefficient.