Table III.
Sample | Cd ligands (±se; Cd edge measurement) | Zn ligands (±se; Zn edge measurement) |
---|---|---|
Young leaves, 100 μm Cd + 10 μm Zn | 20% (±3%) His | 20% (±3%) His |
46% (±3%) O ligandsa | 80% (±2%) O ligandsa | |
35% (±1%) S ligandsb | ||
See above, second sample | 10% (±5%) His | - |
56% (±4%) O ligandsa | ||
34% (±1%) S ligandsb | ||
Mature leaves, 100 μm Cd + 10 μm Zn | 28% (±3%) His | 1% (±3%) His |
38% (±2%) O ligandsa | 99% (±2) O ligandsa | |
34% (±1%) S ligandsb | ||
See above, second sample | 26% (±6%) His | - |
54% (±5%) O ligandsa | ||
21% (±2%) S ligandsb | ||
Mature leaves, 50 μm Cd + 10 μm Zn | 13% (±6%) His | - |
63% (±5%) O ligandsa | ||
24% (±2%) S ligandsb | ||
Mature leaves, 0 μm Cd + 10 μm Zn | - | 40% (±5%) His |
60% (±3%) O ligandsa | ||
Senescent leaves, 100 μm Cd + 10 μm Zn | 25% (±5%) His | - |
59% (±5%) O ligandsa | ||
16% (±2%) S ligandsb | ||
Dead leaves, 100 μm Cd + 10 μm Zn | 39% (±3%) His | 70% (±3%) His |
30% (±3%) O ligandsa | 30% (±2%) O ligandsa | |
31% (±1%) S ligandsb | ||
Mature petioles, 100 μm Cd + 10 μm Zn | 0% (±6%) His | 34% (±5%) His |
75% (±5%) O ligandsa | 66% (±3%) O ligandsa | |
25% (±2%) S ligandsb | ||
Senescent petioles, 100 μm Cd + 10 μm Zn | 11% (±5%) His | - |
70% (±5%) O ligandsa | ||
20% (±2%) S ligandsb | ||
Mature stems, 100 μm Cd + 10 μm Zn | 27% (±3%) His | 38% (±4%) His |
36% (±2%) O ligandsa | 62% (±3%) O ligandsa | |
37% (±1%) S ligandsb | ||
Mature stems, 0 μm Cd + 10 μm Zn | - | 46% (±6%) His |
Senescent stems, 0 μm Cd + 10 μm Zn | 3% (±4%) His | - |
68% (±4%) O ligandsa | ||
29% (±1%) S ligandsb |
No significant difference between the EXAFS spectra of organic acid and aqueous complexes were found; therefore, an average of both data sets was used as model for fitting. b The Cd-glutathione complex was used as model.