Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 18;7(9):e45461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045461

Table 4. Meta-analysis of the rs3802842 in association with colorectal cancer riska.

Genetic model OR (95% CI) P I 2 (%) P heterogeneity P for Egger’s test
Overall
Overall (n = 25) C VS. A 1.15 (1.11–1.19) 0.000 49.6% 0.003 0.533
Overall (n = 24) AC VS. AA 1.18 (1.12–1.24) 0.000 46.3% 0.007 0.216
CC VS. AA 1.31 (1.20–1.42) 0.000 51.3% 0.002 0.968
Dominant model 1.20 (1.15–1.26) 0.000 54.0% 0.001 0.283
Recessive model 1.20 (1.12–1.29) 0.000 37.2% 0.036 0.818
Additive model 1.15 (1.11–1.19) 0.000 47.2% 0.006 0.568
Overall (n = 31) Additive modelb 1.15 (1.11–1.19) 0.000 43.2% 0.006 0.499
Ethnicity
European (n = 21) C VS. A 1.14 (1.11–1.18) 0.000 8.4% 0.349 0.934
European (n = 20) AC VS. AA 1.15 (1.11–1.20) 0.000 0.0% 0.457 0.665
CC VS. AA 1.30 (1.20–1.40) 0.000 20.9% 0.195 0.482
Dominant model 1.18 (1.14–1.22) 0.000 0.0% 0.467 0.841
Recessive model 1.21 (1.12–1.31) 0.000 24.5% 0.155 0.432
Additive model 1.13 (1.09–1.17) 0.000 29.3% 0.108 0.890
Asian (n = 4) C VS. A 1.20 (1.02–1.38) 0.000 88.1% 0.000 0.443
AC VS. AA 1.33 (1.07–1.66)c 0.011 86.6% 0.000 0.210
CC VS. AA 1.39 (1.03–1.87)c 0.033 87.1% 0.000 0.518
Dominant model 1.35 (1.06–1.71)c 0.014 90% 0.000 0.272
Recessive model 1.16 (0.97–1.39)c 0.100 71% 0.016 0.801
Additive model 1.22 (1.09–1.36) 0.000 73.2% 0.011 0.428
Study type
GWAS (n = 3) C VS. A 1.20 (1.14–1.27) 0.000 0.0% 0.948 0.204
AC VS. AA 1.17 (1.09–1.26) 0.000 0.0% 0.571 0.535
CC VS. AA 1.49 (1.33–1.68) 0.000 0.0% 0.463 0.428
Dominant model 1.22 (1.14–1.31) 0.000 0.0% 0.882 0.607
Recessive model 1.40 (1.23–1.59) 0.000 21.3% 0.281 0.453
Additive model 1.20 (1.14–1.26) 0.000 0.0% 0.903 0.275
Replication (n = 22) C VS. A 1.14 (1.10–1.19) 0.000 50.2% 0.004 0.376
Replication (n = 21) AC VS. AA 1.18 (1.13–1.24) 0.000 52.1% 0.003 0.163
CC VS. AA 1.27 (1.16–1.39) 0.000 48.5% 0.007 0.798
Dominant model 1.20 (1.13–1.28) 0.000 59.0% 0.000 0.190
Recessive model 1.15 (1.08–1.24) 0.000 21.0% 0.190 0.936
Additive model 1.14 (1.09–1.19) 0.000 48% 0.008 0.380
Subjects with/without Lynch syndrome
With Lynch syndrome (n = 3) C VS. A 1.22 (1.08–1.35) 0.000 0.0% 0.589 0.355
Without Lynch syndrome (n = 22) C VS. A 1.16 (1.11–1.20) 0.000 56.2% 0.001 0.525
AC VS. AA 1.18 (1.12–1.24) 0.000 50.3% 0.004 0.167
CC VS. AA 1.31 (1.20–1.43) 0.000 55.5% 0.001 0.957
Dominant model 1.21 (1.15–1.27) 0.000 57.6% 0.000 0.224
Recessive model 1.20 (1.12–1.29) 0.000 42.5% 0.019 0.860
Additive model 1.15 (1.11–1.19) 0.000 51.5% 0.003 0.492
a

Crude ORs were combined in a fixed- or random- effects model.

b

Both crude and adjusted ORs were combined.

c

The association between rs3802842 and colorectal cancer risk turned to be null significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing was applied.