Table 3.
Agreement between intrinsic gene sets and adjustment methods
| Intrinsic genes | Kappa* | 95% CI | Adjustment method | Kappa* | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sørlie 500 | Gene centring | ||||
| Original data vs. gene centring | 0.51 | 0.43-0.60 | Sørlie 500 vs. Hu 306 | 0.58 | 0.50-0.67 |
| Original data vs. DWD | 0.49 | 0.41-0.57 | Sørlie 500 vs. PAM50 | 0.52 | 0.43-0.61 |
| Gene centring vs. DWD | 0.83 | 0.77-0.90 | Hu306 vs. PAM50 | 0.85 | 0.79-0.91 |
| Hu 306 | DWD adjusted | ||||
| Original data vs. gene centring | 0.51 | 0.43-0.58 | Sørlie 500 vs. Hu 306 | 0.56 | 0.47-0.65 |
| Original data vs. DWD | 0.5 | 0.42-0.58 | Sørlie 500 vs. PAM50 | 0.55 | 0.47-0.64 |
| Gene centring vs. DWD | 0.95 | 0.92-0.99 | Hu306 vs. PAM50 | 0.67 | 0.59-0.76 |
| PAM50 | |||||
| Original data vs. gene centring | 0.8 | 0.73-0.87 | |||
| Original data vs. DWD | 0.66 | 0.58-0.75 | |||
| Gene centring vs. DWD | 0.67 | 0.58-0.75 | |||