Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun;20(2):160–166.

Table 1.

Comparison between percentile values proposed by Tanner and our data and delta values (Δ) for breast development at Tanner stage 2 (B2) and pubic hair development at Tanner stage 2 (P2) in girls

Girls Percentile B2 Age (yr) Δ (yr) P2 Age (yr) Δ (yr)
Our data 3rd 6.2 2.9 7.4 0.8
Tanner 9.1 9.2
Our data 10th 7.4 2.4 8.2 1.7
Tanner 9.8 9.9
Our data 25th 8.6 1.8 9.2 1.5
Tanner 10.4 10.7
Our data 50th 9.7 1.5 10.3 1.2
Tanner 11.2 11.5
Our data 75th 10 1.9 11.4 0.9
Tanner 11.9 12.3
Our data 90th 12.8 -0.2 12.4 0.6
Tanner 12.6 13.0
Our data 97th 13.6 -0.4 13.2 0.6
Tanner 13.2 13.8