Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 17;38(5):967–980. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbq168

Table 2.

Foci Showing Significant Group Differences in Whole-Brain Amygdala Task-Based Functional Connectivity

X Y Z Hemisphere Anatomical Landmark Region Size (mm cubic) Peak Z-score
Bilateral amygdala SCZ vs CON—negative condition
SCZ > CON
56 −25 −14 Right Middle temporal gyrus 3024 3.90
−62 −45 −10 Left Middle temporal gyrus 1458 3.91
−24 46 26 Left Superior frontal gyrus 351 4.54
23 47 29 Right Superior frontal gyrus 378 4.15
17 28 37 Right Middle frontal gyrus 621 4.47
−28 29 39 Left Middle frontal gyrus 378 3.70
−19 23 51 Left Superior frontal gyrus 621 4.20
7 16 51 Left Superior frontal gyrus 1620 4.26
−6 39 52 Right Superior frontal gyrus 3699 3.81
CON > SCZ
25 −46 −27 Right Cerebellum 405 −3.54
−17 −84 10 Left Cuneus 513 −3.91
−24 −84 22 Left Middle occipital gyrus 378 −4.96
Bilateral amygdala SCZ vs CON—negative minus neutral contrast (interaction test)
−27 −36 −26 Left Cerebellum 810 4.07
2 −23 18 Right Medial dorsal thalamus 864 4.34
13 39 23 Right Medial frontal gyrus 432 4.26
−22 −74 23 Left Precuneus 432 3.24
−27 48 25 Left Superior frontal gyrus 702 4.02
-5 33 31 Right Medial frontal gyrus 594 3.85
15 32 35 Right Medial frontal gyrus 891 3.93
−11 42 43 Left Superior frontal gyrus 3537 4.23
−20 25 50 Left Superior frontal gyrus 378 3.46
5 23 57 Right Superior frontal gyrus 702 4.03

Note: Top panel shows group differences using random-effects independent samples t-tests for negative condition specifically. Bottom panel shows the results of the interaction test (ie, Controls vs. Patients for Negative Minus Neutral Contrast). All reported foci met appropriate whole-brain type I error correction (z > 3.00, k = 13, Corresponding to P < .05, Monte Carlo Corrected Given Employed Smoothing Level). SCZ, patients with schizophrenia; CON, controls.