Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 29;14(2):R70. doi: 10.1186/ar3789

Table 3.

The meta- analysis result combined our data and Turkish data

SNP Nearest gene Risk allele Population N Risk allele frequency P-value Pc value OR (95% CI)

Cases Controls Cases Controls
rs11206377 LOC100129342 G Turkisha 152 170 66.1 51.4 3.0 × 10-4 1.5 × 10-3 1.8 (1.3 to 2.6)
(1p34) Chinese 147 951 56.5 53.9 0.410 NS 1.1 (0.9 to 1.4)
meta-analysis 1.3 (1.1 to 1.6)
rs2061634 KIAA1529 G Turkish 152 170 42.7 26.7 4.2 × 10-5 2.1 × 10-4 2.0 (1.5 to 2.9)
(9q22) Chinese 147 951 79.9 80.0 0.971 NS 1.0 (0.7 to 1.4)
meta-analysis 1.4 (1.1 to 1.7)
rs317711 CPVL C Turkish 152 170 25.5 13.2 1.0 × 10-4 5.0 × 10-4 2.2 (1.4 to 3.3)
(7p15-p14) Chinese 147 951 85.8 84.1 0.739 NS 1.3 (0.9 to 1.9)
meta-analysis 1.6 (1.2 to 2.1)
rs4936742 UBASH3B T Turkish 152 170 56.7 43.4 1.5 × 10-3 7.5 × 10-3 1.7 (1.2 to 2.4)
(11q24) Chinese 147 951 61.5 63.2 0.590 NS 0.9 (0.7 to 1.2)
meta-analysis 1.2 (0.9 to 1.4)
rs9513584 UBAC2 G Turkish 152 170 44.4 33.2 5.8 × 10-3 0.029 1.6 (1.2 to 2.3)
(13q32) Chinese 147 951 51.4 42.3 3.6 × 10-3 0.018 1.4 (1.1 to 1.8)
meta-analysis 1.5(1.2 to 1.8)

aData from reference 19; OR (95% CI), Odds ratio (95%CI); NS: not significant; Pc: Bonferroni corrected P-value