Table 4.
Summary of studies on 64-slice DSCT and 320-slice CT for assessing coronary stents.
| Author/year | Patients (n) | Stents (n) | Scanner type | Non evaluable (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oncel et al. 2008 [60] | 35 | 48 | 64 DSCT | 15 | 100 | 94 | 89 | 100 |
| Pugliese et al. 2008 [88] | 100 | 178 | 64 DSCT | 5 | 94 | 92 | 77 | 98 |
| Pflederer et al. 2009 [89] | 112 | 150 | 64 DSCT | 10 | 84 | 95 | 73 | 97 |
| Zhao et al. 2011 [90] | 30 (gating) | 56 | 64 DSCT | 12.5 | 94 | 87 | 77 | 97 |
| 30 (triggering) | 59 | 64 DSCT | 13.6 | 100 | 84 | 68 | 100 | |
| Veselka et al. 2011 [91] | 34 | 34 | 64 DSCT | 0 | 100 | 74 | 18 | 100 |
| Zhang et al. 2012 [92] | 50 | 115 | 64 DSCT | 0 | 69.2 | 91.2 | 50 | 95.9 |
| De Graaf et al. 2010 [93] | 53 | 89 | 320 MSCT | 8 | 92 | 83 | 46 | 98 |
|
| ||||||||
| Total/mean | 444 | 729 | 8 | 94.9 | 87.0 | 62.3 | 98.6 | |
PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value.