Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Proteome Res. 2011 Mar 2;10(4):1481–1494. doi: 10.1021/pr100877m

Table 2. Mass spectrometry identification of CK2 interactions with eIF3.

CK2 complexes were isolated from an S. cerevisiae strain expressing TAP-Ckb2 and an isogenic, untagged yeast strain as a negative control. MudPIT mass spectrometry analyses of the purified complexes were performed in triplicate. PAF values were used to approximate protein abundances as in Fig. 1.

Yeast
Protein
Locus TAP-Ckb2 negative
control
Cka1 YIL035C 6.3(1.2) nda
Cka2 YOR061C 5.6(1.0) nd
Ckb2 YOR029C 5.5(1.0) nd
Ckb1 YGL019W 3.6(0.66) nd
Tif34 YMR146C 2.1(0.38) nd
Rpg1 YBR079C 2.1(0.39) nd
Tif35 YDR429C 1.9(0.34) nd
Nip1 YMR309C 1.5(0.27) nd
Prt1 YOR361C 1.5(0.28) nd
Tif5 YBR041W nd nd
a

nd = none detected