Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 26;25(5):620–627. doi: 10.1007/s10278-012-9499-x

Table 2.

Performance comparing with that of [14]

Method TP TN SE (%) SP (%) ACC (%)
[14] 58 77 80.56 80.21 80.36
SOM (4 neurons) 55 78 76.39 81.25 79.17
k-means (4 clusters) 52 82 72.22 85.42 78.42
FCM (4 clusters) 51 77 70.83 80.21 76.19
SOM (9 neurons) 61 80 84.72 83.33 83.93
k-means (9 clusters) 57 82 79.17 85.42 82.74
FCM (9 clusters) 58 76 80.56 79.17 79.76
SOM (16 neurons) 62 77 86.11 80.21 82.74
k-means (16 clusters) 64 79 88.89 82.29 85.12
FCM (16 clusters) 54 79 75.00 82.29 79.17
SOM (25 neurons) 62 80 86.11 83.33 84.52
k-means (25 clusters) 63 81 87.50 84.38 85.71
FCM (25 clusters) 56 78 77.78 81.25 79.76
SOM (36 neurons) 62 84 86.11 87.50 86.90
k-means (36 clusters) 59 86 81.94 89.58 86.31
FCM (36 clusters) 53 75 73.61 78.13 76.19
SOM (49 neurons) 62 91 86.11 94.79 91.07
k-means (49 clusters) 62 85 86.11 88.54 87.50
FCM (49 clusters) 48 82 66.67 85.42 77.38
SOM (64 neurons) 54 91 75.00 94.79 86.31
k-means (64 clusters) 58 86 80.56 89.58 85.71
FCM (64 clusters) 51 80 70.83 83.33 77.98
SOM (81 neurons) 58 88 80.56 91.67 86.98
k-means (81 clusters) 62 84 86.11 87.50 86.90
FCM (81 clusters) 57 74 79.17 77.08 77.98
SOM (100 neurons) 61 87 84.72 90.63 88.10
k-means (100 clusters) 61 86 84.72 89.58 87.50
FCM (100 clusters) 58 74 80.56 77.08 78.57