Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 22;103(4):689–701. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.06.041

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Hemifusion diaphragm growth kinetics: model predictions versus experiment of Nikolaus et al. (17). (A) Legend. Three hemifused pairs were experimentally studied: blue pair (vesicle areas Aveslarge = 824 μm2, Avessmall = 887 μm2), red pair (1550 and 3260 μm2), and green pair (422 and 5030 μm2). HD growth terminated in HD rupture (blue and red pairs) or vesicle lysis (green pair, smaller vesicle). (B) HD size evolution. (Data points) Experiment and (solid lines) model predictions. (Dashed lines) Predicted final equilibrium area that would have been attained had HDs not ruptured (blue and red pair). (C) Short time kinetics in panel B. (Blue and red pairs) Model fitted to data using estimated initial tension γ0 = 8.7 mN/m (see main text) yielding best-fit value for interleaflet friction coefficient λ = 1.1 (±0.2) × 109 N s/m3. (Green pair) Model fitted to data using initial tension as fitting parameter, yielding best-fit value γ0 = 15 ± 2 mN/m. (Solid black line) Short time analytical model prediction (Eq. 13) for red and blue pairs. (DF) Predicted evolutions of vesicle and HD tensions. HD tensions are consistent with observed HD rupture in panels D and E. In all cases the initial vesicle tensions exceeded the rupture threshold.