Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 1;11:11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-11-11

Table 2.

Inter-rater agreement measured Cohen´s Kappa with quadratic weighting, intra class correlation coefficient and Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficient with 95 % confidence intervals of quantity and quality criteria of the first diagnosis of each participant

Raters Objects Na Kw Intra Class Correlation Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient
Quantity
 
 
 
 
1 vs 2
61
.82 (.70, .90)
.82 (.72, .89)
.82 (.72, .89)
3 vs 4
60
.83 (.75, .89)
.83 (.73, .89)
.84 (.74, .90)
2 vs 4
57
.72 (.55, .83)
.73 (.58, .83)
.73 (.57, .83)
5 vs 6
38
.82 (65,. 91)
.83 (.69, .91)
.82 (.68, .91)
7 vs 8
25
.75 (.61, .87)
.75 (.53, .88)
.75 (.53, .88)
Quality
 
 
 
 
1 vs 2
61
.75 (.59, .85)
.75 (.62, .84)
.76 (.63, .85)
3 vs 4
60
.76 (.55, .83)
.76 (.63, .85)
.76 (.63, .85)
2 vs 4
57
.73 (.59, .84)
.73 (.59, .83)
.73 (.59, .84)
5 vs 6
38
.74 (.51,. 87)
.75 (.57, .86)
.74 (.56, .86)
7 vs 8 25 .79 (.55, .91) .80 (.61, .90) .80 (.60, . 90)

aQuality and quantity criteria of the accuracy measurement based on the D-Catch instrument.