Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Immunol. 2012 Sep 2;13(10):963–971. doi: 10.1038/ni.2405

Figure 1. Identification of BM progenitors that lack myeloid and erythroid clonogenic potential.

Figure 1

(a) CD7 and CD10 expression on CD34+linBone Marrow (BM) cells (representative of 7 independent experiments). Error bars represent SEM. * = p<0.050, ** = p<0.010, *** = p<0.001 (b) Myeloid and erythroid clonogenic output in methylcellulose assay of the CD34+lin subsets shown. (Total n=4, CD10CD7 and CD10CD7+ n=2, CD10+ n=5) (c) Flow cytometry isolation strategy of CD34+linCD45RA+10+ (“CD10+”) and CD34+linCD45RA+CD10CD62Lhi (“CD10CD62Lhi ”). Over 30 independent BMs examined (see also Fig S3). (d) Myeloid and erythroid clonogenic capacity of each subset shown. All populations shown, including “total” are CD34+lin. (p<0.001 comparing CD10CD45RA+ and CD10CD45RA+CD62Lhi; frequency was also significantly decreased in CD10 CD62Lhi and CD10+ relative to all other populations shown, see Table S1a, b). IL3Rlo CD45RA(“CMP”), IL3RCD45RA(“MEP”), and IL3Rlo CD45RA+ (“GMP”). (e) CD62L expression on CD34+linpopulations shown, representative of over 20 independent BMs. (f) Flow cytometry of gated CD34+linCD10 cells showing lack of CD7 expression on CD62Lhi cells, representative of 5 independent BM. [For all phenotypes, lin is defined as negative for CD3, CD14, CD15 (aka FUT4), CD19, CD56 (aka NCAM1), and CD235a (aka GYPA)].