Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 8;7(4):499–509. doi: 10.1007/s12263-012-0289-3

Table 1.

Anthropometric characteristics, fasting and postprandial values of all subjects at the end of each intervention period

All subjects (n = 35)
Preparation Linoleic acid from safflower oil Tonalin® (50:50 mix) Cis-9, trans-11 CLA Trans-10, cis-12 CLA p-Value within group
Anthropometry
Weight 84.2 (±2.0) 84.2 (±2.0) 84.1 (±2.0) 84.0 (±2.0) 0.851
BMI (kg/m2) 26.1 (±0.5) 26.1 (±0.4) 26.0 (±0.4) 26.0 (±0.5) 0.900
Waist (cm) 102.1 (±1.5) 102.1 (±1.6) 102.3 (±1.5) 101.3 (±1.5) 0.172
Hip (cm) 104.8 (±1.0) 104.8 (±1.0) 104.8 (±1.0) 104.0 (±1.0) 0.824
Waist/hip ratio 0.97 (±0.01) 0.97 (±0.01) 0.98 (±0.01) 0.97 (±0.01) 0.645
Fasting values
Plasma glucose (mg/dl) 96.5 (±1.4) 98.2 (±1.5) 97.5 (±1.5) 96.5 (±1.4) 0.487
Serum insulin (μU/ml) 12.5 (±1.0) 12.9 (±1.0) 12.5 (±1.1) 12.2 (±1.0) 0.898
HOMA-IR (μU/ml*mg/dl/405 3.0 (±0.3) 3.2 (±0.2) 3.1 (±0.3) 2.9 (±0.3) 0.828
Triacylglycerols (mg/dl) 127.0 (±10.1) 124.4 (±10.8) 119.1 (±8.9) 124.7 (±10.6) 0.787
Adiponectin (ng/ml) 7,334 (±467) 7,452 (±497) 7,681 (±493) 7,172 (±479) 0.152
Plasma leptin (pg/ml) 5,054 (±532)a 4,732 (±482)a,b 5,027 (±559)a 4,425 (±528)b 0.054
Postprandial values
Glucose AUC (mg/dl) 483.0 (±8.9) 484.5 (±8.3) 472.3 (±7.9) 447.6 (±23.4) 0.111
Insulin AUC (μU/ml) 155.6 (±11.3)b 137.5 (±10.2)a 143.6 (±10.8)a 157.2 (±13.0)b 0.054
HOMA-IR AUC 189.0 (±14.8)a,b 167.3 (±13.4)a 169.2 (±13.7)a 195.4 (±19.5)b 0.025*
Triacylglycerols (mg/dl) 1,661 (±130) 1,621 (±126) 1,536 (±111) 1,666 (±135) 0.445
Adiponectin 5 h (ng/ml) 7,364 (±471) 7,401 (±467) 7,540 (±484) 7,067 (±470) 0.161
Leptin AUC (pg/ml) 39,092 (±4,060) 38,220 (±3,934) 39,502 (±4,386) 36,467 (±4,523) 0.320

All values are expressed as mean ± SEM

CLA conjugated linoleic acid, BMI body mass index

* Significant differences between intervention periods in overall test (p ≤ 0.05; MANOVA). Duncan′s post hoc test was used to describe where the differences between intervention groups appeared. Means that are significantly different from others are marked as unlike letters. p-Value ≤ 0.1 was seen as a trend. To demonstrate where differences occurred in analyses, means were marked as unlike letters, too. For details of diets, see research design and methods