Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 21;3:342. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00342

Table 1.

Number of total OTUs detected in each tissue for all the samples tested; total number of OTUs estimated by different approaches: Chao, Jackknife and Bootstrapping; and percentage of the total estimated OTUs detected in the samples.

Number of OTUs expected by Percentage of sampled OTUs from the expected number by
Groups N Number of OTUs detected Chao approach Jackknife approach Bootstrapping approach Chao approach Jackknife approach Bootstrapping approach
All 186 34 34.12 ± 0.44 34.99 ± 0.99 35.04 ± 0.98 99.65 97.16 97.03
Leaves 62 24 24.1 ± 0.38 24.98 ± 0.98 25.09 ± 1.28 99.59 96.06 95.64
Rhizomes 57 28 28.29 ± 0.68 29.96 ± 1.38 29.89 ± 1.67 98.97 93.44 93.67
Roots 67 28 40.5 ± 17.14 32.93 ± 2.61 30.08 ± 1.34 69.14 85.04 93.08

N = number of samples.