Table 1.
Number of total OTUs detected in each tissue for all the samples tested; total number of OTUs estimated by different approaches: Chao, Jackknife and Bootstrapping; and percentage of the total estimated OTUs detected in the samples.
Number of OTUs expected by | Percentage of sampled OTUs from the expected number by | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Groups | N | Number of OTUs detected | Chao approach | Jackknife approach | Bootstrapping approach | Chao approach | Jackknife approach | Bootstrapping approach |
All | 186 | 34 | 34.12 ± 0.44 | 34.99 ± 0.99 | 35.04 ± 0.98 | 99.65 | 97.16 | 97.03 |
Leaves | 62 | 24 | 24.1 ± 0.38 | 24.98 ± 0.98 | 25.09 ± 1.28 | 99.59 | 96.06 | 95.64 |
Rhizomes | 57 | 28 | 28.29 ± 0.68 | 29.96 ± 1.38 | 29.89 ± 1.67 | 98.97 | 93.44 | 93.67 |
Roots | 67 | 28 | 40.5 ± 17.14 | 32.93 ± 2.61 | 30.08 ± 1.34 | 69.14 | 85.04 | 93.08 |
N = number of samples.