Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Evolution. 2012 Feb 19;66(7):2240–2251. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01574.x

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Empirical distribution of maximum likelihood estimates of λ for 1000 sets of trait values simulated on the Geospiza phylogeny with 13 taxa transformed with λ = 0.6, using σ = 0.18. Most such datasets yielded a maximum likelihood estimate of 0; the mean estimate is λ=0.35. (b) As above, but simulating trait values on a much larger phylogenetic tree (a single, simulated Yule tree with 281 tips), again transformed with λ = 0.6. The estimated values now cluster around the true value, and have mean λ=0.59. (c) The data can be more informative about some parameters than others: shown is the empirical distribution of maximum likelihood estimates of the diversification rate σ for the same simulations as in (a). The mean of the distribution is σ=0.18, matching the value used in the simulations.