. 2012 Aug 7;110(5):1067–1078. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs167

Table 4.

Genome size estimates for leaf and pollen nuclei and ANOVA results for effect of nucleus type

			Genome size (pg/1C)				ANOVA
Species	Pollen type	Standard	Leaf	1C pollen	2C pollen	s.e.	d.f.	F	P
Brassica napus¹	Trinucleate	Tomato²	1·183^a	1·177^b		0·007417	1	13·470	0·0214
Eupatorium perfoliatum	Trinucleate	Tomato	2·47^a	2·44^b		0·01125	1	70·687	0·0011
Zea mays³	Trinucleate	Tomato	2·65^a	2·67^a		0·01123	1	2·596	0·1824
Buddleia davidii	Binucleate	Soybean⁴	1·55^a	1·54^b	1·52^c	0·002464	2	48·482	< 0·0001
Solanum lycopersicum²	Binucleate	Soybean	1·06^a	1·05^a	1·03^b	0·007100	2	97·766	< 0·0001
Vicia faba⁵	Binucleate	Rye⁶	13·62^a	13·60^a	13·48^b	0·05665	2	34·034	< 0·0001

Genome size estimates are least-square means from the ANOVA for that species. Standard error (s.e.) is the same for all genome size estimates within a species. Estimates with the same letter within a species are not significantly different, Tukey's HSD, α = 0·05. Numbers in bold are significant values (P < 0·05).

¹B. napus ‘Hyola 401’; ²S. lycopersicum ‘Stupické polní rané’, 1·96 pg/2C, Doležel et al. (1992); ³Z. mays ‘CE-777’; ⁴Glycine max ‘Polanka’, 2·50 pg/2C, Doležel et al. (1994); ⁵V. faba ‘Inovec’; ⁶Secale cereale ‘Dankovské’, 16·19 pg/2C, Doležel et al. (1998).