Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 21;7(9):e45670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045670

Table 1. Experiment 1 error rates and saccadic latencies (ms).

retinotopic close-intermediate center-intermediate far-intermediate future-field
Errors
test 4% 4% 4% 5% 4%
control 5% 4% 4% 4% 4%
difference 1% 0% 0% −1% 0%
Saccadic latencies
test 228 227 224 223 228
control 224 229 226 224 227
difference −4 1 2 1 −1