Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 21;7(9):e45493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045493

Table 4. Results of the meta-analysis for LR vs RFA in treatment of CLM.

Variables Time interval Subgroups Nsuvival/NLR Nsuvival/NRFA LR vs RFARR (95%CI) p I2 Ref.
Overall survival 3 years Total 802/1249 269/587 1.377(1.246–1.522) <0.001 56.6% 26–34
<3 cm 157/213 33/72 1.680(1.279–2.208) <0.001 90.0% 26,31
Solitary 306/481 150/290 1.263(1.109–1.439) <0.001 64.0% 24,27,29–31,36
Open 139/280 29/125 2.549(1.801–3.609) <0.001 73.4% 26,30
Perc 240/349 55/114 1.143(0.947–1.379) 0.014 48.8% 24,27,28,34,35
5 years Total 610/1249 182/587 1.474(1.284–1.692) <0.001 21.7% 26–36
<3 cm 123/213 20/72 2.168(1.442–3.260) <0.001 84.4% 26,31
Solitary 250/481 119/290 1.209(1.025–1.426) 0.024 0.0% 24,27,29–31,36
Open 95/280 24/125 2.012(1.321–3.064) 0.001 81.8% 26,30
Perc 188/349 39/114 1.426(1.062–1.915) 0.018 0% 24,27,28,34,35
Disease-free survival 3 years Total 539/1171 135/519 1.735(1.483–2.029) <0.001 65.4% 26–32,34–36
<3 cm 98/213 18/72 2.238(1.480–3.385) <0.001 97.7% 26,31
Solitary 343/653 101/276 1.435(1.212–1.699) <0.001 61.5% 27–31,36
Open 117/280 25/125 2.309(1.544–3.453) <0.001 82.5% 26,30
Perc 137/329 9/114 3.853(2.065–7.190) <0.001 6.6% 27,28,34,35
5 years Total 456/1171 83/519 2.227(1.823–2.720) <0.001 71.8% 26–32,34–36
<3 cm 81/213 17/72 1.104(1.039–1.173) 0.001 97.9% 26,31
Solitary 324/653 64/276 2.014(1.624–2.499) <0.001 78.8% 27–31,36
Open 93/280 4/125 8.477(3.565–20.156 <0.001 70.5% 26,30
Perc 118/329 5/114 3.763(1.762–8.033) 0.001 41.3% 27,28,34,35

LR: liver resection. RFA: radiofrequency ablation. RR: risk ratio. CI: confidence interval. <3 cm refers to the maximal tumor diameter was less than 3 cm. Open means that RFA was conducted under open surgery condition. Perc means that RFA was conducted percutaneously.