Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug;166(8):2430–2440. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01972.x

Table 1.

Physical and echocardiographic data in sham-operated and HF rats at the end of the study period

Sham-operated HF/control HF/Bisoprolol
Physical data
 BW (kg) 0.463 ± 0.014 0.446 ± 0.010 0.470 ± 0.013
 HW (g) 1.15 ± 0.04 1.40 ± 0.02* 1.28 ± 0.04*
 HW/BW (g·kg−1) 2.50 ± 0.08 3.14 ± 0.12* 2.73 ± 0.09*
Echocardiography
 HR (bpm) 333.9 ± 11.1 332.4 ± 4.66 287.5 ± 7.28&
 LV EF (%) 67.1 ± 0.9 26.3 ± 1.2* 35.5 ± 1.7*
 LVIDd (mm) 8.27 ± 0.17 10.95 ± 0.13* 9.97 ± 0.15*
 LVIDs (mm) 5.14 ± 0.16 9.51 ± 0.16* 8.18 ± 0.20*
 LVAWDd (mm) 1.72 ± 0.03 1.46 ± 0.05* 1.45 ± 0.06*
 LVPWDd (mm) 1.68 ± 0.06 2.02 ± 0.06* 2.17 ± 0.08*
 Infarct size (%) 44.8 ± 3.7 45.2 ± 4.3

anova analysis and Bonferroni test were used among all three groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 versus Sham; P < 0.05 versus HF/control, &P < 0.05 versus Sham and HF/control.

BW = body weight, HW = heart weight, HR = heart rate, LV EF = LV ejection fraction, LVIDd = LV internal diameter at diastole, LVIDs = LVID at systole, LVAWDd = LV anterior wall diameter at diastole, LVPWDd = LV posterior wall diameter at diastole.