Table 3.

Summary of primary and secondary analyses.

Comparison of Interest	t	df	P*
Primary Analysis
Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention (n=27) vs. No-Contact Control (n = 16), post-test	−0.34	36	0.63
Secondary Analyses
Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention (n = 27) vs. No- Contact Control (n = 16), 3-month follow-up	−0.39	36	0.65
Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention (n = 27) vs. No- Contact Control (n = 16), 6-month follow-up	−0.74	36	0.77
Education-Only (n = 10) vs. No-Contact Control (n = 16), post-test	−0.80	19	0.78
Education-Only (n = 10) vs. No-Contact Control (n = 16), 3- month follow-up	1.24	19	0.11
Education-Only (n = 10) vs. No-Contact Control (n = 16), 6-month follow-up	0.92	19	0.19
Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention & Education-Only combined (n = 37) vs. No-Contact Control (n = 16), post- test	−0.48	46	0.68
Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention & Education-Only combined (n = 37) vs. No-Contact Control (n = 16), week 12	−0.15	46	0.56
Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention & Education-Only combined (n = 37) vs. No-Contact Control (n = 16), 6- month follow-up	−0.38	46	0.65

^*The p-value reported comes from a 1-sided test of the null hypothesis that the intervention is no better than the control, using an analysis of covariance model with the global statistical test as the dependent variable and treatment-group assignment as the independent variable, adjusting for baseline covariates that were significantly (p < 0.15) different between comparison groups.