Table 2.
NHW (ref) | Hispanic | p-value1 | AA | p-value2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Waist (cm) Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 |
62.2 (0.8) 62.4 (0.9) 64.9 (0.7) |
67.9 (0.9) 67.9 (0.9) 66.4 (0.3) |
<0.0001 <0.0001 0.07 |
73.1 (1.8) 73 (1.8) 65.4 (0.3) |
<0.0001 <0.0001 0.8 |
VAT (cm2) Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 |
21.2 (1.2) 21.5 (1.3) 24.9 (0.9) |
24.9 (1.3) 24.9 (1.3) 23.3 (1) |
0.06 0.1 0.4 |
22.9 (2.6) 22.6 (2.7) 13.7 (2) |
0.8 0.9 <0.0001 |
SAT (cm2) Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 |
92.5 (7.7) 93.1 (8) 121.5 (3.3) |
140.8 (8.4) 140.7 (8.4) 127.3 (3.4) |
<0.0001 <0.0001 0.9 |
194.4 (16.5) 193.7 (16.8) 121.5 (3.2) |
<0.0001 <0.0001 0.4 |
VSR Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 |
0.27 (0.009) 0.27 (0.009) 0.26 (0.008) |
0.23 (0.009) 0.23 (0.009) 0.24 (0.008) |
0.0009 0.0013 0.2 |
0.18 (0.02) 0.18 (0.02) 0.22 (0.02) |
<0.0001 <0.0001 0.2 |
STR Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 |
0.7 (0.02) 0.7 (0.02) 0.7 (0.02) |
0.8 (0.02) 0.8 (0.02) 0.8 (0.02) |
0.002 0.002 0.2 |
0.8 (0.04) 0.8 (0.04) 0.8 (0.03) |
0.0002 0.02 0.9 |
IMCL Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 |
2 (0.09) 2 (0.1) 2.1 (0.1) |
2.6 (0.1) 2.6 (0.1) 2.5 (0.1) |
<0.0001 <0.0001 0.006 |
2.9 (0.2) 2.9 (0.2) 2.6 (0.2) |
<0.0001 <0.0001 0.1 |
Model 1: Adjusting for age, sex, Tanner stage, Tanner × age interaction
Model 2: Model 1 + dietary fat, physical activity
Model 3: Model 2 + BMI
Hispanic vs. NHW α=0.05
AA vs. NHW α=0.05