Table 2.
Classification scores (sensitivity+specificity)/2 of the mean from Monte Carlo subsampling scores (and respective standard deviation) and when training the classifiers using all released training sample (759 subjects) and predicting the released test sample (170 subjects).
| Monte Carlo (%) | SD (%) | All training set (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TD VS. ADHD | |||
| AdaB | 53.6 | 3.9 | 55.5 |
| Bagg | 51.5 | 10.0 | 57.9 |
| LogB | 53.0 | 3.7 | 57.4 |
| L2L2SVMd | 52.7 | 3.6 | 52.3 |
| L2L2SVMp | 52.6 | 3.8 | 54.6 |
| L2L1SVMd | 52.7 | 3.6 | 52.3 |
| L1L2SVM | 52.7 | 3.5 | 55.8 |
| L1logR | 53.0 | 2.8 | 53.8 |
| L2logRd | 53.3 | 3.7 | 57.0 |
| L2logR | 53.2 | 3.8 | 57.0 |
| COMBINED VS. INATTENTIVE | |||
| AdaB | 58.6 | 5.9 | 55.4 |
| Bagg | 58.5 | 7.1 | 59.3 |
| LogB | 58.4 | 7.2 | 60.4 |
| L2L2SVMd | 66.0 | 5.9 | 64.1 |
| L2L2SVMp | 66.0 | 5.9 | 63.2 |
| L2L1SVMd | 66.0 | 5.9 | 64.1 |
| L1L2SVM | 62.4 | 6.5 | 59.4 |
| L1logR | 64.3 | 6.0 | 63.2 |
| L2logRd | 67.0 | 5.6 | 65.1 |
| L2logR | 66.9 | 5.7 | 64.1 |
These results are based on ReHo+fALFF features in TD vs. ADHD classification and ReHo+fALFF+RSN4 in combined vs. inattentive ADHD classification.