Table A3.
LOSO (%) | k-fold (%) | |
---|---|---|
TD VS. ADHD | ||
AdaB | 63.4 | 59.3 |
Bagg | 61.7 | 58.2 |
LogB | 64.3 | 63.7 |
L2L2SVMd | 59.0 | 60.4 |
L2L2SVMp | 58.9 | 61.2 |
L2L1SVMd | 59.6 | 60.1 |
L1L2SVM | 59.9 | 61.2 |
L1logR | 57.8 | 61.5 |
L2logRd | 58.4 | 62.4 |
L2logR | 58.4 | 62.4 |
COMBINED VS. INATTENTIVE | ||
AdaB | 53.2 | 56.2 |
Bagg | 60.2 | 58.4 |
LogB | 58.7 | 53.0 |
L2L2SVMd | 56.5 | 54.7 |
L2L2SVMp | 58.0 | 55.0 |
L2L1SVMd | 56.9 | 54.7 |
L1L2SVM | 59.1 | 53.6 |
L1logR | 61.3 | 54.7 |
L2logRd | 57.6 | 55.5 |
L2logR | 58.0 | 57.4 |
These results are based on ReHo+fALFF features in TD vs. ADHD classification and ReHo+fALFF+RSN4 in combined vs. inattentive ADHD classification.