Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Indian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Indian Journal of Microbiology
. 2008 Jan 11;47(4):289–297. doi: 10.1007/s12088-007-0054-2

Induced systemic resistance (ISR) in plants: mechanism of action

Devendra K Choudhary 1, Anil Prakash 1, B N Johri 1,✉
PMCID: PMC3450033  PMID: 23100680

Abstract

Plants possess a range of active defense apparatuses that can be actively expressed in response to biotic stresses (pathogens and parasites) of various scales (ranging from microscopic viruses to phytophagous insect). The timing of this defense response is critical and reflects on the difference between coping and succumbing to such biotic challenge of necrotizing pathogens/parasites. If defense mechanisms are triggered by a stimulus prior to infection by a plant pathogen, disease can be reduced. Induced resistance is a state of enhanced defensive capacity developed by a plant when appropriately stimulated. Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and induced systemic resistance (ISR) are two forms of induced resistance wherein plant defenses are preconditioned by prior infection or treatment that results in resistance against subsequent challenge by a pathogen or parasite. Selected strains of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) suppress diseases by antagonism between the bacteria and soil-borne pathogens as well as by inducing a systemic resistance in plant against both root and foliar pathogens. Rhizobacteria mediated ISR resembles that of pathogen induced SAR in that both types of induced resistance render uninfected plant parts more resistant towards a broad spectrum of plant pathogens. Several rhizobacteria trigger the salicylic acid (SA)-dependent SAR pathway by producing SA at the root surface whereas other rhizobacteria trigger different signaling pathway independent of SA. The existence of SA-independent ISR pathway has been studied in Arabidopsis thaliana, which is dependent on jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene signaling. Specific Pseudomonas strains induce systemic resistance in viz., carnation, cucumber, radish, tobacco, and Arabidopsis, as evidenced by an enhanced defensive capacity upon challenge inoculation. Combination of ISR and SAR can increase protection against pathogens that are resisted through both pathways besides extended protection to a broader spectrum of pathogens than ISR/SAR alone. Beside Pseudomonas strains, ISR is conducted by Bacillus spp. wherein published results show that several specific strains of species B. amyloliquifaciens, B. subtilis, B. pasteurii, B. cereus, B. pumilus, B. mycoides, and B.sphaericus elicit significant reduction in the incidence or severity of various diseases on a diversity of hosts.

Keywords: Induced systemic resistance, SAR, Signalling and expression, Jasmonate and ethylene signalling, Pathogenesis-related proteins

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (118.9 KB).

References

  • 1.Weller D.M., Raajmakers J.M., Gardener B.B.M., Thomashow L.S. Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressivness plant pathogens. Annl Rev Phytopathol. 2002;40:309–348. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.40.030402.110010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Haas D., Keel C., Reimann C. Signal transduction in plant beneficial rhizobacteria with biocontrol properties. Antonie van Leeuw. 2002;81:385–395. doi: 10.1023/A:1020549019981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Loon L.C., Glick B.R. Increased plant fitness by rhizobacteria. In: Sandermann H., editor. Molecular ecotoxicology of plants. Berlin: Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2004. pp. 177–205. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Haas D., Défago G. Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nature Rev Microbiol. 2005;4:1–13. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pieterse C.M.J., Ton J., Loon L.C. Cross-talk between plant defence signaling pathways: boost or burden? Agri Biotech Net. 2001;3:1–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ton J., Pelt J.A., Loon L.C., Pieterse C.M.J. Differential effectiveness of salicylate-dependent and jasmonate/ethylene-dependent induced resistance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2002;15:27–34. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.1.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Harman G.E., Howell C.R., Viterbo A., Chet I., Lorito M. Trichoderma species, opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nature Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:43–56. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ongena M., et al. Stimulation of the lipooxygenase pathway is associated with systemic resistance induced in bean by a nonpathogenic Pseudomonas strain. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2004;17:1009–1018. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.9.1009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Verhagen B.W.M., et al. The transcription of rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2004;17:895–908. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.8.895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Iavicoli A., Boutet E., Buchela A., Métraux J.-P. Induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana in response to root inoculation with P. fluorescens CHA0. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2003;16:851–858. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.10.851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Audenaert K., Pattery T., Comelis P., Hötte M. Induction of systemic resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato by P. aeruginosa 7NSK2: role of salicylic acid, pyochelin, and pyocyanin. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2002;15:1147–1156. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.11.1147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pathak A., Sharma A., Johri B.N. Pseudomonas strain GRP3 induces systemic resistance to sheath blight in rice. Int Rice Res Notes. 2004;29:35–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ryu C.-M., et al. Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004;134:1017–1026. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.026583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bakker P.A.H.M., Ron L.X., Pieterse C.M.J., Loon L.C. Understanding the involvement of rhizobacteria-mediated induction of systemic resistance in biocontrol of plant diseases. Can J Plant Pathol. 2003;25:5–9. doi: 10.1080/07060660309507043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Loon L.C. Systemic induced resistance. In: Slusarenko A.J., Fraser R.S.S., Loon L.C., editors. Mechanisms of resistance to plant diseases. Dordrechet: Kluwer; 2000. pp. 521–574. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gómez-Gómez L. Plant perception systems for pathogen recognition and defence. Mol Immunol. 2004;41:1055–1062. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2004.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Erbs G., Newmann M.A. The role of lipopolysaccharides in induction of plant defense responses. Mol Plant Pathol. 2003;4:421–425. doi: 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00179.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Meziane H., Vander S.I., Loon L.C., Höfte M., Bakker P.A.H.M. Determinants of P. putida WCS 358 involved in induced systemic resistance in plants. Mol Plant Pathol. 2005;6:177–185. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2005.00276.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Durrent W.E., Dong X. Systemic acquired resistance. Annl Rev Phytopathol. 2004;42:185–209. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dong X. NPR1, all things considered. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004;7:547–552. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Meyer G., Höfte M. Salicylic acid produced by the rhizobacteria P. aeruginosa 7NSK2 induces resistance to leaf infection by Botrytis cinerea on bean. Phytopathol. 1997;87:588–593. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.6.588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ryu C.M., Hu C.H., Reddy M.S., Kloepper J.W. Different signaling pathways of induced resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana against two pathovars of P. syringae. New Phytol. 2003;16:413–420. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00883.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Park K.S., Kloepper J.W. Activation of PR-1a promotes by rhizobacteria which induce systemic resistance in tobacco against P. syringae pv. tabaci. Biol Control. 2000;18:2–9. doi: 10.1006/bcon.2000.0815. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang S., Moyne A.L., Reddy M.-S., Kloepper J.W. The role of salicylic acid in induced systemic resistance elicited by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria against blue mold of tobacco. Biol Control. 2002;25:288–296. doi: 10.1016/S1049-9644(02)00108-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kinkema M., Fan W., Dong X. Nuclear localization of NPR1 is required for activation of PR gene expression. Plant Cell. 2000;12:2339–2350. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.12.2339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Després C., Delong C., Glaze S., Liu E., Fobert P.R. The Arabidopsis NPR1/Nim 1 protein enhances the DNA binding activity of a subgroup of the TGA family of bZIP transcription factors. Plant Cell. 2000;12:279–290. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.2.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Subramaniam R., Desveaux D., Spickler C., Michnick S.W., Brisson N. Direct visualisation of protein interaction in plant cells. Nature Biotechnol. 2001;19:769–772. doi: 10.1038/90831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thomma B.P.H.J., Tierens K.F.M., Penninckx I.A.M.A., Mauch-Mani B., Broekaert W.F., Cammue B.P.A. Different micro-organisms differentially induces Arabidopsis disease response pathways. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2001;39:673–680. doi: 10.1016/S0981-9428(01)01282-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Thomma B.P.H.J., Eggermont K., Broekaert W.F., Cammue B.P.A. Disease development of several fungi on Arabidopsis can be reduced by treatment with methyl jasmonate. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2000;38:421–427. doi: 10.1016/S0981-9428(00)00756-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Achuo E.A., Audenaert K., Meziane H., Höfte M. The salicylic acid-dependent defense pathway is effective against different pathogens in tomato and tobacco. Plant Pathol. 2004;53:65–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2004.00947.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Conrath U., Pieterse C.M.J., Mauch-mani B. Priming in plant-pathogen interactions. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7:210–216. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02244-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kim M.S., Kim Y.C., Cho B.H. Gene expression analysis in cucumber leaves primed by root colonization with P. chlororaphis O6 upon challenge-inoculation with Corynespora cassiicola. Plant Biol. 2004;6:105–108. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-817803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sharma A., Johri B.N., Sharma A.K., Glick B.R. Plant growth promoting bacterium Pseudomonas sp. Strain GRP3 influences iron acquisition in mung bean (Vigna radiate L. Wilzeck) Soil Biol Biochem. 2003;35:887–894. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00119-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sharma A, Jansen R, Johri BN & Wray V (2007) Molecular and structural characterization of rhamnolipids of rhizobacteria that reduce post-emergence dampinf-off disease in chile and tomato in Central Himalayan region. J Nat Prod (In Press)
  • 35.Sharma A., Wray V., Johri B.N. Molecular characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria that enhance peroxidase and phenylalanine ammonia lyase activities in chile (Capsicum annuum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Arch Microbiol. 2007;188:483–494. doi: 10.1007/s00203-007-0270-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wees S.C.M., Pieterse C.M.J., Trijssenaar A., Westende Y., hartog F., Loon L.C. Differential induction of systemic resistance in Arabidopsis by biocontrol bacteria. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 1997;10:716–724. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.1997.10.6.716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Duijff B.J., Meijer J.W., Bakker P.A.H.M., Schippers B. Siderophore-mediated competition for Fe and induced resistance in the suppression of Fusarium wilt of carnation by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Netherland J Plant Pathol. 1993;99:277–289. doi: 10.1007/BF01974309. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Leeman M., Pelt J.A., Den O.F.M., Heinsbroek M., Bakker P.A.H.M., Schippers B. Induction of systemic resistance by P. fluorescens in radish cultivars differing in susceptibility to Fusarium wilt, using a novel bioassay. Euro J Plant Pathol. 1995;101:655–664. doi: 10.1007/BF01874869. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Meyer G., Audenaert K., Höfte M. Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2-induced systemic resistance in tobacco depends on in planta salicylic acid accumulation but is not associated with PR1a expression. Euro J Plant Pathol. 1999;105:513–517. doi: 10.1023/A:1008741015912. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Meyer G., Capieau K., Audenaert K., Buchela A., Métraux J.P., Höfte M. Nanogram amounts of SA produced by rhizobacteria P. aeruginosa 7NSK2 activate the SAR pathway in bean. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 1999;12:450–458. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.5.450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Maurhofer M., Hase C., Meuwly P., Métraux J.P., Défago G. Induction of systemic resistance of tobacco to TNV by the root-colonizing P. fluorescens strain CHA0: influence of the gacA gene and of pyoverdine production. Phytopathol. 1994;84:139–146. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-84-139. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Siddiqui I.A., Saukat S.S. Suppression of root-knot disease by P. fluorescens CHA0 in tomato: importance of bacterial secondary metabolite 2,4 DAPG. Soil Biol Biochem. 2003;35:1615–1623. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.08.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Weller D.M., Pelt J.A., Mavrodi D.V., Pieterse C.M.J., Bakker P.A.H.M., Loon L.C. ISR in Arabidopsis against P. syringae pv. tomato by 2,4 DAPG-producing P. fluorescens. Phytopathol. 2004;94:5108. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-08-11-0222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Leeman M., Pelt J.A., Den O.F.M., Heinsbroek M., Bakker P.A.H.M., Schippers B. Induction of SR against Fusarium wilt of radish by LPS of P. fluorescens. Phytopathol. 1995;85:1021–1027. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-85-1021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Leeman M., Den O.F.M., Pelt J.A., Dirkx F.P.M., Steijl H., Bakker P.A.H.M., Schippers B. Iron availability affects induction of SR aginst Fusarium wilt of radish P. fluorescens. Phytopathol. 1996;86:149–155. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-86-149. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Peer R., Schippers B. LPS of plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas sp. strain WCS417r induce resistance in carnation to Fusarium wilt. Nether Plant Pathol. 1992;98:129–139. doi: 10.1007/BF01996325. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Reitz M., Oger P., Meyer A., Niehaus K., Farrand S.K., Hallmann J., Sikora R.A. Importance of the O-antigen, core-region and lipid A of rhizobial LPS for the induction of SR in potato to Globodera pallida. Nematol. 2002;4:73–79. doi: 10.1163/156854102760082221. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Press C.M., Wilson M., Tuzun S., Kloepper J.W. SA produced by S. imarcescens 90–166 is not the primary determinant of ISR in cucumber/ tobacco. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 1997;10:761–768. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.1997.10.6.761. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Siddiqui I.A., Saukat S.S. Systemic resistance in tomato induced by biocontrol bacteria against the root-knot nematode, Meloidegyne javanica is independent of SA production. J Phytopathol. 2004;152:48–54. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0434.2003.00800.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Spencer M., Ryu C.M., Yang K.Y., Kim Y.C., Kloepper J.W., Anderson A.J. Induced defense in tobacco by P. chlororaphis strain O6 involves at least the ethylene pathway. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2003;63:27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2003.09.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pieterse C.M.J., Wees S.C.M., Hoffland E., Pelt J.A., Loon L.C. SR in Arabidopsis induced by biocontrol bacteria independent of SA accumulation and PRs expression. Plant Cell. 1996;8:1225–1237. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.8.1225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yan Z., Reddy M.S., Ryu C.M., Mc Inroy J.A., Wilson M., Kloepper J.W. Induced systemic protection against tomato late blight elicited by PGPR. Phytopathol. 2002;92:1329–1333. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.12.1329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES