Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 9;12:66.

Table 2.

Significant results relating key independent variables to TB outcomes

Outcome variable Significant key independent variable Effect on outcome variable after a 1% increase of the key independent variable 95% CI P-value Fit
TB Incidence per 100,000 % of NTP budget for MDR-TB Increase of 1 case per 100,000 0.99–1.00 case per 100,000 0.032 AIC−27.0
TB Case detection rate (%) % of NTP budget for ACSM/CTBC 0.27% increase 0.07%–0.47% 0.02 AIC 166.6
Smear Positive TB deaths per smear positive TB cases % of NTP budget for First-Line Drugs 0.1% decrease 0.02%–0.2% 0.02 QIC 2.4112
% of NTP budget for Management and Administration 0.13% decrease 0.09%–0.17% <0.0001
% of NTP budget for MDR-TB 0.05% decrease 0.01%–0.09% 0.007
% of NTP budget for DOT 0.11% increase 0.04%–0.17% 0.0002
NTP budget/GDP (std dev = 0.0013) 0.9% increase 0.55%–1.2% <0.0001
Notification per TB incidence % of NTP budget for Laboratory supplies and equipment 0.18% increase 0.012%–0.34% 0.05 AIC−15.7
Drug susceptibility testing among TB patients per TB incidence % of the population covered by DOT 114% increase 95%–130% 0.01 AIC 75.3
HIV testing among TB patients per TB incidence % of NTP budget for TB-HIV 1.13% increase 0.6%–1.6% <0.0001 QIC 44.0707
NTP budget/GDP (std dev = 0.0013) 7% decrease 1.7%–12% 0.009

AIC: Akaike information criteria; QIC: Quasilikelihood under the Independence model Criterion