Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 31;5:183. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-183

Table 1.

Distribution of Leishmania infected dogs by test method, district and locality

District Locality No. dogs examined (a)Detection of Leishmania
(b)Infected (%)
Culture (%) ITS1-PCR (%) ELISA (%)
Jericho
Zbeidat
4
 
 
1/3 (33.3)
1 (25)
 
Marj Na’jeh
6
 
1 (16.7)
1 (16.7)
1 (16.7)
 
Marj al Ghazal
8
 
 
 
 
Qalqylia
Azzoun
30
 
4 (13.3)
 
4 (13.3)
Tubas
Seir
2
 
 
 
4 (26.7)
 
Tammoun
15
 
3 (20)
1 (6.7)
 
Jenin
Silat Al-Hartheyeh
19
 
1 (5.3)
1 (5.3)
2 (10.5)
 
Al-Yamoun
16
 
1 (6.3)
4 (25)
5 (31.3)
Salfit
Salfit
10
 
 
3 (33.3)
3 (33.3)
 
Rafat
8
 
2 (25)
 
2 (25)
 
Kafr Al-Diek
18
 
1(5.6)
 
1 (5.6)
 
Zawieh
10
 
 
 
 
Bethlehem
Obeidieh
31
1 (3.2)
 
1(3.2)
2 (6.4)
Hebron
Hatta
17
1(5.9)
8 (47)
3 (17.6)
8 (47)
 
Beit Oula
21
1(4.8)
2 (9.5)
1(5.6)
3 (1.4)
Total   215 3/197 (1.5) 23/200 (11.5) 16/212 (7.5) 36 (16.7)

(a) Positive samples/tested (%).

(b) Infected: positive by ELISA or/and PCR or/and culture.