Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Soc Serv Res. 2012 Jun 20;38(4):503–514. doi: 10.1080/01488376.2012.696416

Table 2.

Mean Performance on Outcome Measures, by Group and Pre/Post Status

Group KCANa
ECb
PTb
IRI-1b
IRI-2b
M SD n M SD n M SD n M SD n M SD n
Intervention-Pre .53 0.09 41 4.08 0.68 41 4.00 0.71 41 . . . . . .
Intervention-Post .73* 0.13 41 4.14 0.71 38 4.21 0.64 38 4.37 0.48 37 4.12* 0.59 37
Comparison-Pre .55 0.11 51 3.76 0.62 51 3.87 0.60 51 . . . . . .
Comparison-Post .62 0.13 51 3.87 0.63 51 3.96 0.61 51 4.13 0.60 51 3.82 0.62 51

Note. KCAN = Knowledge Scale, Child Abuse and Neglect; EC = adapted Empathic Concern subscale of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) (Davis, 1980); PT = adapted Perspective Taking subscale of the IRI; IRI-1 = Interpersonal Reactivity Index, EC subscale; IRI-2 = Interpersonal Reactivity Index, PT subscale. Unless otherwise noted, unadjusted means are reported throughout the table.

The two original subscales of the IRI were administered at posttest only.

*

Differences between groups (intervention and comparison) are significant at p .05.

Differences between groups (intervention and comparison) approached significance at p ≤ .05.

a

Parent Knowledge scores are reported as the percentage of items correct out of 20 questions. Because results were analyzed using an Analysis of Covariance, adjusted means are reported.

b

Scores on the EC, PT, IRI-1, and IRI-2 scales are reported as the average rating of seven items on a scale from 1 (does not describe me at all) to 5 (describes me very well) with higher scores indicating higher levels of empathic concern (EC and IRI-1) or cognitively taking the perspective of another (PT and IRI-2).