Skip to main content
. 2005 Jan 26;14(5):474–479. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0822-1

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

A comparison of the analytical and experimental results. The pressure reduction was normalized with the readings in the conventional cannula. The error bars indicate a 95% confidence interval from the mean. The radius of the proximal section was normalized with that of the distal section. There is a good fit between the analytical and experimental findings.