Skip to main content
. 2006 Jun 20;23(5):223–228. doi: 10.1007/s10815-006-9036-2

Table II.

Clinical Parameters of Ovarian Stimulation for Three Groups of Patients

Variable LP NhCGP hCGP
E2 level at hCG injection (pg/mL)a 2764±1221.4b 1872.0±700.5b,c 2551.4±1565.0b,c
Total FSH amount (IU)a 2358.9±424.5b 2201.2±511.3b,c 1819.5±435.5b,c
Days of FSH administration (days) 9.2±1.1 8.9±1.7 8.8±1.5
No. of oocytesd 14.3±7.8b 11.2±6.2b 11.2±7.1b
Maturation rate (%)e 79.3 (747/942)f 73.3 (508/693)f,g 81.6 (577/707)g
Fertilization rate (%) 73.6 (550/747) 77.0 (391/508) 73.1 (422/577)
D3 high quality embryo rate (%)e 24.1 (111/460)g 32.1 (118/368) 36.1 (137/380)g
ET cancellation rate (%) 12.1 (8/66) 10.0 (6/63) 6.3 (4/63)
Pregnancy rate (GS) (%) 63.8 (37/58) 36.8 (21/57) 40.7 (24/59)
Pregnancy rate (FCA) (%) 56.9 (33/58) 36.8 (21/57) 39.0 (23/59)
Implantation rate (%) 35.3 (41/116) 25.2 (27/107) 24.3 (28/115)
Miscarriage rate (%) 16.2 (6/37) 10.5 (2/21) 9.1 (2/24)
OHSS rate (severe) 9.1 (6/66) 1.6 (1/63) 1.6 (1/63)
No. of frozen embryosh 3.0±3.3i 1.8±2.0i,j 2.0±2.6i,j

aP = 0.001 by F-test for one-way ANOVA.bP = 0.001 by t-test, for comparison of LP and NhCGP, LP and hCGP.cP = 0.01 by t-test, for comparison of NhCGP and hCGP.dP = 0.017 by F-test for one-way ANOVA.eP = 0.001 by chi-square test.fP = 0.01 by Yates method, for comparison of LP and NhCGP.gP = 0.001 by Yates method, for comparison of NhCGP and hCGP, LP and hCGP.hP = 0.039 by F-test for one-way ANOVA.iP = 0.001 by t-test, for comparison of LP and NhCGP, LP and hCGP.jP = 0.033 by t-test, for comparison of NhGP and hCGP.