Abstract
Purpose: The ability of six morphological criteria (embryo development rate, fragmentation, regularity of blastomere shape, equality of blastomere size, zona pellucida thickness variation [ZPTV], and visible mononucleated blastomeres [VMBs]) to predict pregnancy in IVF treatment cycles was evaluated.
Methods: In order to select a homogeneous study group, 85 consecutive nulliparous couples with single tubal infertility undergoing their first IVF treatment and receiving three preembryos at embryo replacement 2 days after ovum pickup were included.
Results: A total of 255 preembryos was replaced two days after ovum pickup and resulted in 34 clinical pregnancies (40%). By logistic regression analysis, ZPTV and VMBs showed highly significant and strong predictive values, whereas none of the other parameters was a significant predictor of pregnancy. In the treatments in which all replaced preembryos had a ZPTV of less than 15%, the pregnancy rate was extremely low (1/22). If the maximum ZPTV of any of the replaced preembryos was in the interval between 15 and 20%, the pregnancy rate was 24.1% (7/29). In the treatments in which at least one preembryo had a ZPTV of more than 20%, the pregnancy rate was 76.5% (26/34). When VMBs were added to the results of the ZPTV analysis, the pregnancy rate was as high as 92.3% (24/26).
Conclusions: ZPTV and VMBs seem to be strong predictors of pregnancy in IVF treatment and thus important indicators of good embryo quality.
Key Words: in vitro fertilization, preembryo, zona Pellucida, blastomere, pregnancy
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (510.5 KB).
References
- 1.Nijs M, Geerts L, Roosendaal E, Segal-Bertin G, Vanderzwalmen P, Schoysman R. Prevention of multiple pregnancies in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril. 1993;59:1245–1250. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55984-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Plachot M. Choosing the right embryo: The challenge of the nineties. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer. 1989;6:193–194. doi: 10.1007/BF01132863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Veeck L. Oocyte assessment and biological performance. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1987;541:259–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb22263.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rooseboom TJ, Vermeiden JPW. Evaluation of embryo scoring systems and their value in predicting in vitro fertilization outcome. Assist Reprod Rev. 1995;5:53–59. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Puissant F, Rysselberge MV, Barlow P, Deweze J, Leroy F. Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment. Hum Reprod. 1987;2:705–708. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cummins JM, Breen TM, Harrison YL, Shaw JM, Wilson LM, Hennesey JF. A formula for scoring human embryo growth rates in in vitro fertilization: Its value in predicting pregnancy and in comparison with visual estimates of embryo quality. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer. 1986;3:284–295. doi: 10.1007/BF01133388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Visser DS, Fourie FR. The applicability of the cumulative embryo score system for embryo selection and quality control in an in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1719–1722. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Daniel SAJ. Factors influencing outcomes after in vitro fertilization. Assist Reprod Rev. 1995;5:204–213. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bolton VN, Hawes SM, Taylor CT, Parsons JH. Development of spare human preimplantation embryos in vitro: An analysis of the correlations among gross morphology, cleavage rates, and development to blastocyst. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer. 1989;6:30–35. doi: 10.1007/BF01134578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cohen J, Leigh IK, Suzman M, Wiker SR, Wright G. Videocinematography of fresh and cryopreserved embryos: A retrospective analysis of embryonic morphology and implantation. Fertil Steril. 1989;51:820–827. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60673-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Csemizsky Z, Hagenfeldt K, Wramsby H. Selection of ovarian stimulation protocol is related to IVF treatment outcome in women 35 years of age and older. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1994;11:474–477. doi: 10.1007/BF02215711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. Boston: John Wiley & Sons; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wramsby H, Fredga K, Liedholm P. Ploidy in human cleavage stage ova after fertilization in vitro. Hum Reprod. 1987;2:233–236. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chan PJ. Development potential of human oocytes according to zona pellucida thickness. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer. 1987;4:237–237. doi: 10.1007/BF01533763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cohen J, Wiemer KE, Wright G. Prognostic value of morphologic characteristics of cryopreserved embryos: A study using videocinematography. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:827–827. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59892-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cohen J, Elsner C, Kort H, Malter H, Massey J, Mayer MP, Weimer K. Impairment of the hatching process following IVF in the human and improvement of implantation by assisted hatching using micromanipulation. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:7–13. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Steer CV, Mills CL, Tan SL, Campbell S, Edwards RG. The cumulative embryo score: A predictive embryo score technique to select the optimal number of embryos to transfer in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:117–119. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Staessen C, Camus M, Bollen N, Devroey P, Steirteghem AC. The relationship between embryo quality and the occurrence of multiple pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 1992;57:626–630. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lewin A, Schenker JG, Safran A, Zigelman N, Avrech O, Abramov Y, Friedler S, Reubinoff BE. Embryo growth rate in vitro as an indicator of embryo quality in IVF. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1994;11:500–503. doi: 10.1007/BF02216029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hoover L, Baker A, Check JH, Lurie D, O’Shaughnessy A. Evaluation of a new embryo-grading system to predict pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1995;40:151–157. doi: 10.1159/000292326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Plachot M, Veiga A, Montagut J, Grouchy J, Calderon G, Lepetre S, Junca A, Santalo J, Carles E, Mandelbaum J, Bari P, Degoy J, Cohen J, Egozcue J, Sabatier JC, Salat-Baroux J. Are clinical and biological IVF parameters correlated with chromosomal disorders in early life? A multicenter study. Hum Reprod. 1988;3:627–635. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Olivennes F, Hazout A, Lelaidier C, Freitas S, Fanchin R, Ziegler D, Frydman R. Four indications for embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:2367–2373. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dawson KJ, Conaghan J, Ostera GR, Winston RL, Hardy K. Delaying transfer to the third day post-insemination, to select non-arrested embryos, increases development to fetal heart stage. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:177–182. doi: 10.1093/humrep/10.1.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schulman A, Ben-Nun I, Gethler Y, Kaneti H, Shilon M, Beyth Y. Relationship between embryo morphology and implantation rate after in vitro fertilization treatment in conception cycles. Fertil Steril. 1993;60:123–126. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56048-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]