Table 3.
Multivariate analysis of the association of individual, structural and contextual characteristics with migration status among 1567 female sex workers, Karnataka India, Jan–July 2008
| Characteristics | Non-Migrant n=730 | Migrant n=645 | Mobile n=192 |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| AOR (95%CI)* | AOR (95%CI)* | ||
| Main place of solicitation† | |||
| Street | 1 (Ref) | 1.0 (Ref) | 1 (Ref) |
| Home | 1 (Ref) | 0.02 (0.01–0.05) | 0.05 (0.02–0.1) |
| Brothel | 1 (Ref) | 5.7 (1.6–20.0) | 2.9 (0.9–9.5) |
| Other | 1 (Ref) | 0.1 (0.03–0.4) | 0.04 (0.02–0.1) |
| Marital status | |||
| Non-Devadasi | 1 (Ref) | 1 (Ref) | 1 (Ref) |
| Devadasi | 1 (Ref) | 0.6 (0.3–1.3) | 0.2 (0.1–0.4) |
| Monthly income from sex work (INR) | |||
| <1000 | 1 (Ref) | 0.21(0.09–0.5) | 0.5 (0.3–0.9) |
| 1000–2999 | 1 (Ref) | 1 (Ref) | 1 (Ref) |
| 3000–4999 | 1 (Ref) | 3.7 (1.8–7.6) | 1.8 (0.9–3.6) |
| 5000+ | 1 (Ref) | 42.2 (12.6–142) | 13.2 (3.9–44.6) |
| Languages spoken | |||
| One | 1 (Ref) | 1 (Ref) | 1 (Ref) |
| Two | 1 (Ref) | 3.1 (1.6–6.1) | 0.5 (0.3–0.8) |
| More than two | 1 (Ref) | 5.6 (2.6–12.0) | 0.8 (0.4–1.4) |
| Number of clients per day‡ | 1 (Ref) | 2.9 (1.2–7.2) | 0.7 (0.4–1.3) |
| Number of sex acts per day‡ | 1 (Ref) | 3.5 (1.3–9.3) | 5.3 (2.9–9.5) |
| Source of income other than sex work | |||
| No | 1 (Ref) | 1 (Ref) | 1 (Ref) |
| Yes | 1 (Ref) | 0.3 (0.2–0.6) | 0.7 (0.4–1.3) |
Abbreviations: Ref=Reference or baseline, AOR=Adjusted Odds Ratio; CI=Confidence Interval; INR: Indian Rupees. 1US dollar = Approximately 42 INR
Odds ratios adjusted for age and district
Place of solicitation at the place of residence for non-migrant and at place of destination for migrant and mobile FSWs
Adjusted odds ratio represents the increase in odds with each additional client/sex act