Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct;78(19):6819–6828. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01223-12

Table 5.

Relative abundance of major bacterial groups in field samples combined from Taif and South Platte River riverbeds and two laboratory column systemsa

Bacterial group Relative abundance (%)
Infiltration zone
Unsaturated Low-DOC column Moderate-DOC column
1–2 cm 10–50 cm 1 cm 15 cm 30–60 cm
Proteobacteria 50.9 40.8 22.0 36.5 75.7 33.7 33.9
    Alphaproteobacteria 12.1 11.2 9.7 7.9 7.8 7.5 10.2
    Betaproteobacteria 18.5 14.5 3.9 8.5 59.6 15.7 13.8
    Gammaproteobacteria 7.8 8.3 5.1 7.5 6.6 3.7 2.8
    Deltaproteobacteria 7.8 3.5 2.1 4.0 0.2 6.3 6.1
    Other 3.8 3.3 1.1 8.5 1.6 0.5 1.0
Acidobacteria 3.2 6.9 3.6 9.2 0.1 3.2 4.2
Actinobacteria 2.5 6.3 17.4 1.5 5.7 4.1 5.3
Bacteroidetes 18.8 10.8 9.6 5.2 12.4 12.6 11.5
Chloroflexi 4.1 1.4 0.7 0.2 0 0.3 0.4
Cyanobacteria 1.5 0.4 0.2 1.5 0 0 0
Firmicutes 2.2 4.6 27.4 2.9 2.8 26.8 20.1
Gemmatimonadetes 0.3 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.2 1.1 2.3
Nitrospira 0.7 2.9 0.6 6.5 0 0.5 1.0
Planctomycetes 2.7 4.1 1.4 3.5 0.1 0.6 2.1
Verrucomicrobia 1.2 2.1 1.4 1.3 0.2 5.5 4.1
Other 11.0 16.7 10.1 26.1 2.7 11.3 14.6
a

The two laboratory column systems included low-DOC-sediment columns regardless of depth and moderate-DOC-sediment columns at a 1-cm depth, a 15-cm depth, and collectively binned for 30- to 60-cm depths.