Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Fam Issues. 2012 Jun 14;33(9):1272–1293. doi: 10.1177/0192513X12447178

Table 2.

Results of Path Analysis

Endogenous Variables

Relocation G1 Drinking
Probs
G2 Substance
Use Probs
G2 CESD G2 Warmth &
Supportiveness
G3 Delinquency G3 CESD

B (se) β B β B β B β B β B β B β

Canada (In Canada = 1) −.06 (.21) −.02 .43 (.19) .14* .09 (.05) .10* 1.64 (1.19) .06 .11 (.05) .11* −.32 (.46) −.03 2.76 (1.23) .11*
Youth Gender (Female = 1) .01 (.14) .01 .10 (.12) .05 −.01 (.03) −.01 −1.65 (.86) −.09 .01 (.03) .01 −.57 (.31) −.08 1.48 (.77) .09
Relocation Program .20 (.10) .19* .04 (.02) .13 −.78 (.73) −.08 −.001 (.02) −.004 .17 (.24) .05 −.12 (.60) −.01
G1 Drinking Problems .09 (.02) .29*** 1.50 (.55) .16** .02 (.02) .06 −.22 (.22) −.06 −.54 (.53) −.07
G2 Substance Use Problems −.16 (.05) −.16** 1.10 (.54) .10* .77 (1.35) .03
G2 CESD .00 (.002) .01 .04 (.01) .10* .10 (.04) .12**
G2 Warmth & Supportiveness −2.04 (.48) −.19*** −6.06 (1.07) −.24***
Covariances
G3 Delinquency with CESD 6.81 (1.2) .24***
G2 CESD with Substance Use Probs .79 (.15) .27***

p < .10;

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001; 2-tailed tests