Table 2.
Results of Path Analysis
| Endogenous Variables | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relocation | G1 Drinking Probs |
G2 Substance Use Probs |
G2 CESD | G2 Warmth & Supportiveness |
G3 Delinquency | G3 CESD | ||||||||
| B (se) | β | B | β | B | β | B | β | B | β | B | β | B | β | |
| Canada (In Canada = 1) | −.06 (.21) | −.02 | .43 (.19) | .14* | −.09 (.05) | −.10* | 1.64 (1.19) | .06 | −.11 (.05) | −.11* | −.32 (.46) | −.03 | −2.76 (1.23) | −.11* |
| Youth Gender (Female = 1) | .01 (.14) | .01 | .10 (.12) | .05 | −.01 (.03) | −.01 | −1.65 (.86) | −.09† | .01 (.03) | .01 | −.57 (.31) | −.08† | 1.48 (.77) | .09† |
| Relocation Program | .20 (.10) | .19* | .04 (.02) | .13† | −.78 (.73) | −.08 | −.001 (.02) | −.004 | .17 (.24) | .05 | −.12 (.60) | −.01 | ||
| G1 Drinking Problems | .09 (.02) | .29*** | 1.50 (.55) | .16** | .02 (.02) | .06 | −.22 (.22) | −.06 | −.54 (.53) | −.07 | ||||
| G2 Substance Use Problems | −.16 (.05) | −.16** | 1.10 (.54) | .10* | .77 (1.35) | .03 | ||||||||
| G2 CESD | .00 (.002) | .01 | .04 (.01) | .10* | .10 (.04) | .12** | ||||||||
| G2 Warmth & Supportiveness | −2.04 (.48) | −.19*** | −6.06 (1.07) | −.24*** | ||||||||||
| Covariances | ||||||||||||||
| G3 Delinquency with CESD | 6.81 (1.2) | .24*** | ||||||||||||
| G2 CESD with Substance Use Probs | .79 (.15) | .27*** | ||||||||||||
p < .10;
p < .05;
p < .01;
p < .001; 2-tailed tests