Table 6.
Populations compareda | Snnb | HSTc |
---|---|---|
By geographic region | ||
Region A (36) vs. region B (14) vs. region C (10) vs. region D (6) |
0.5468* |
0.0469** |
By host origin | ||
triticale (33) vs. wheat (33) |
0.8654** |
0.0397** |
By year of collection within host origin wheat | ||
Region D 1980’s (6) vs. Region A-B-C 2009–2010 |
0.7283ns |
−0.0025ns |
By geographic region within host origin triticale | ||
region A (16) vs. region B (8) vs. region C (9) |
0.5899** |
0.1008** |
region A (16) vs. region B (8) |
0.6597ns |
0.0019ns |
region A (16) vs. region C (9) |
0.7667* |
0.1116* |
region B (8) vs. region C (9) |
0.8677* |
0.1428* |
By pathogenicity | ||
Pathogenic (37) vs. non-pathogenic (29) on triticale | 0.9811** | 0.0565** |
Region A represents Belgium, region B France, region C Poland and region D Israel.
aSample sizes are in parentheses.
bSnn (the nearest neighbor statistic) measures how often the most similar sequence (or sequences) is from the same designated population. Snn has a high power with small population sizes.
cHST is a measure of population subdivision that estimates FST among populations.
P-values were estimated after 1000 permutations; nsP > 0.01; *P < 0.01; **P < 0.001.