Adaptability
|
The guideline is available in a variety of versions for different users or purposes
|
Sources
|
Internet, peer reviewed journal
|
Versions
|
Full text, summary, print, digital
|
Users
|
Tailored for patients or caregivers
|
Useability
|
Content is organized to enhancethe ease with which the guideline can be used
|
Navigation
|
Table of contents
|
Evidence
|
Narrative, tabulated or both
|
Recommendations
|
Narrative, graphic (algorithms) or both; Recommendation summary (single list in full or summary version rather than dispersed)
|
Validity
|
Evidence is summarized and presented such that its quantity and quality are apparent
|
Number of references
|
Total number of distinct references to evidence upon which recommendations are based
|
Evidence graded
|
A system is used to categorize quality of evidence supporting each recommendation
|
Number of recommendations
|
Total number of distinct recommendations
|
Applicability
|
Information is provided to help interpret and apply guidelines for individual patients
|
Clinical considerations
|
Information such as indications, criteria, risk factors, drug dosing that facilitates application of the recommendations explicitly highlighted as tips or practical issues using sub-titles or text boxes, or summarized in tables and referred to in recommendations or narrative
|
Communicability
|
Resources for providers or patients to inform, educate, support and involve patients
|
Inform, educate, support
|
Informational, educational or supportive resources for patients/caregivers, or contact information (phone, fax, email or URL) for such resources
|
Decision making
|
Questions or tools for clinicians to facilitate discussion with patients, or decision aids to support patient involvement
|
Relevance
|
The focus or purpose of the guideline is explicitly stated
|
Objective
|
Explicitly stated purpose of guideline (clinical, education, policy, quality improvement)
|
Stakeholders
|
Specify who would deliver (individuals, teams, departments, institutions, managers, policy makers, internal/external agents) and receive the services (specify type of patients)
|
Needs
|
Identification of stakeholder needs, perspectives, interests or values
|
Accommodation
|
Anticipated changes, resources and competencies required to adapt and accommodate guideline utilization are identified
|
Technical
|
Equipment or technology needed, or the way services should be organized
|
Regulatory
|
Industrial standards for equipment or technology, or policy regarding their use
|
Human resources
|
Type and number of health professionals needed to deliver recommended services
|
Professional
|
Education, training or competencies needed by clinicians/staff to deliver recommendations
|
Workflow
|
Anticipated changes in workflow or processes during/after adoption of recommendations
|
Costs
|
Direct or productivity costs incurred by acquiring resources or training to accommodate guidelines, or as a result of service reductions during transition from old to new processes
|
Implementation
|
Processes for planning and applying local strategies to promote guideline utilization are described
|
Identify barriers
|
Individual, organizational, or system barriers that could challenge adoption, or instructions for local needs assessment of guideline users
|
Tailor guideline
|
Instructions, tools or templates to tailor guideline/recommendations for local context
|
Integrated tools
|
Point-of-care templates/forms (clinical assessment, standard orders) to integrate guidelines within care delivery processes
|
Promote utilization
|
Possible mechanisms by which to promote guideline utilization
|
Evaluation |
Processes for evaluating guideline implementation and utilization are described |
Implementation
|
Methods for evaluating the implementation process
|
Utilization |
Audit tools or performance measures/quality indicators to assess the organization, delivery and outcomes of guideline recommended care |