Table 2. Behavioural performance of the go/nogo task, subdivided in blocks with TMS and the block without TMS, and statistical comparison between the three groups.
| Controls | H/I-low | H/I-high | ANOVA | ||
| (C) | (L) | (H) | F (2, 51) | Post Hoc Tests | |
| Blocks with TMS Performance level (go/nogo-task) | |||||
| Reaction times, ms | 384 (59) | 383 (59) | 388 (39) | 0.04 | – |
| Reaction time variability, ms | 74 (23) | 81 (25) | 83 (21) | 0.7 | – |
| Commission errors | 0.88 (0.75) | 0.64 (0.75) | 1.14 (1.65) | 0.8 | – |
| Block without TMS Performance level (go/nogo-task) | |||||
| Reaction times, ms | 375 (62) | 369 (61) | 381 (33) | 0.2 | – |
| Reaction time variability, ms | 71 (37) | 79 (37) | 81 (33) | 0.4 | – |
| Commission errors | 0.48 (0.67) | 0.27 (0.46) | 0.57 (1.34) | 0.5 | – |