Table 5. Effect of structural profile matrix on classification.
Classification With Matrix | Classification Without Matrix | |||||
Species | Sensitivity(%) | Specificity(%) | Accuracy(%) | Sensitivity(%) | Specificity(%) | Accuracy (%) |
Homo sapiens | 89.80 | 91.59 | 90.78 | 91.00 | 90.44 | 90.69 |
Canis familiaris | 89.93 | 96.15 | 93.01 | 91.19 | 95.51 | 93.33 |
Mus musculus | 86.78 | 91.66 | 89.22 | 89.94 | 87.93 | 88.93 |
Rattus norvegicus | 93.87 | 92.52 | 93.24 | 92.34 | 91.37 | 91.89 |
Drosophila melanogaster | 90.26 | 95.57 | 92.92 | 85.84 | 94.69 | 90.26 |
Caenorhabditis elegans | 88.99 | 93.33 | 91.12 | 88.07 | 93.33 | 90.65 |
The structural profile matrix proves itself as an important feature which increases the performance of the classification system by providing a novel biological feature.