Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 27;32(26):8890–8899. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5698-11.2012

Table 5.

Effect of CDR on RSN pairs

RSN ANOVA
CDR 0* t CDR 0.5* t CDR 1*
F p
DMN–DAN 8.52 0.00023 −0.1 t = 1.88, p = 0.060, d = −0.23 −0.091 t = 2.53, p = 0.013, d = −0.53 −0.065
DMN–CON 3.068 0.047 0.043 0.056 0.037
DMN–SAL 0.51 0.48 0.0050 0.0035 0.00
DMN–SMN 9.62 0.000079 −0.098 t = 0.93, p = 0.35, d = 0.12 −0.092 t = 3.69, p = 0.0003, d = −0.81 −0.058
DAN–CON 0.13 0.88 0.027 0.026 0.022
DAN–SAL 1.89 0.067 −0.033 −0.026 −0.027
DAN–SMN 1.53 0.22 0.077 0.081 0.06
CON–SAL 0.12 0.73 0.038 0.043 0.029
CON–SMN 7.43 0.00066 −0.095 t = 1.34, p = 0.18, d = −0.16 −0.085 t = 2.62, p = 0.0098, d = −0.61 −0.051
SAL–SMN 3.16 0.043 −0.032 −0.022 −0.0081

*Mean z-transformed correlation values.

Results of t test between CDR stages. Bold indicated significance (p < 0.05, Bonferonni corrected). Effect size is reported as Cohen's d.