Table 5.
Effect of CDR on RSN pairs
RSN | ANOVA |
CDR 0* | t† | CDR 0.5* | t† | CDR 1* | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | p | ||||||
DMN–DAN | 8.52 | 0.00023 | −0.1 | t = 1.88, p = 0.060, d = −0.23 | −0.091 | t = 2.53, p = 0.013, d = −0.53 | −0.065 |
DMN–CON | 3.068 | 0.047 | 0.043 | 0.056 | 0.037 | ||
DMN–SAL | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.0050 | 0.0035 | 0.00 | ||
DMN–SMN | 9.62 | 0.000079 | −0.098 | t = 0.93, p = 0.35, d = 0.12 | −0.092 | t = 3.69, p = 0.0003, d = −0.81 | −0.058 |
DAN–CON | 0.13 | 0.88 | 0.027 | 0.026 | 0.022 | ||
DAN–SAL | 1.89 | 0.067 | −0.033 | −0.026 | −0.027 | ||
DAN–SMN | 1.53 | 0.22 | 0.077 | 0.081 | 0.06 | ||
CON–SAL | 0.12 | 0.73 | 0.038 | 0.043 | 0.029 | ||
CON–SMN | 7.43 | 0.00066 | −0.095 | t = 1.34, p = 0.18, d = −0.16 | −0.085 | t = 2.62, p = 0.0098, d = −0.61 | −0.051 |
SAL–SMN | 3.16 | 0.043 | −0.032 | −0.022 | −0.0081 |
*Mean z-transformed correlation values.
†Results of t test between CDR stages. Bold indicated significance (p < 0.05, Bonferonni corrected). Effect size is reported as Cohen's d.