Skip to main content
. 2012 May 18;11:55. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-11-55

Table 4.

Comparative CCC results for the developed equation and two published equations, stratified by sex, glucose and BMI thresholds and apo B quartile

 
 Male
 Female
 glucose >126mg/dl
 Glucose <126mg/dl
 BMI>25kg/m2
 BMI<25kg/m2
  CCC [95% CI] CCC [95% CI] CCC [95% CI] CCC [95% CI] CCC [95% CI] CCC [95% CI]
Equation1
 0.92
 [0.92
 0.93]
 0.94
 [0.93
 0.94]
 0.91
 [0.90
 0.92]
 0.94
 [0.93
 0.94]
 0.92
 [0.91
 0.92]
 0.93
 [0.93
 0.94]
Equation2
 0.90
 [0.90
 0.90]
 0.91
 [0.91
 0.91]
 0.84
 [0.82
 0.85]
 0.91
 [0.91
 0.92]
 0.89
 [0.88
 0.89]
 0.91
 [0.91
 0.91]
Equation3
 0.92
 [0.92
 0.92]
 0.94
 [0.94
 0.94]
 0.84
 [0.82
 0.86]
 0.94
 [0.94
 0.94]
 0.91
 [0.91
 0.91]
 0.94
 [0.94
 0.94]
Apolipoprotein B Quartile
 
 Q1(<80.24)
 Q2(80.24< Q2< 90.95)
 Q3(90.95< Q3<112.86)
 Q4(>112.86)
 
 CCC
 [95% CI]
 CCC
 [95% CI]
 CCC
 [95% CI]
 CCC
 [95% CI]
Equation1
 0.71
 0.70
 0.72
 0.25
 0.23
 0.26
 0.56
 0.53
 0.56
 0.75
 0.74
 0.76
Equation2
 0.51
 0.50
 0.51
 0.22
 0.20
 0.23
 0.56
 0.55
 0.57
 0.72
 0.71
 0.72
Equation3 0.66 0.65 0.67 0.23 0.21 0.24 0.53 0.56 0.54 0.80 0.79 0.81

N = 36,524 participants who were randomly divided into a validation set.