Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct;14(10):883–890. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0111

Table 1.

Effect of Recalibration and Filtering on Recorded Continuous Glucose Monitoring of Hypoglycemia for the Entire Cohort and per Patient

  Original CGM Recalibrated CGM Recalibrated and filtered CGM Filtered valid ISIGthen recalibrated CGM
Overall cohort results
 Number of hypoglycemic events 161 193 131 146
 Duration (% of CGM record<2.6 mmol/L) 2.2 2.6 2.5 2.6
 Hypoglycemic index (μmol/L) 4.9 7.1 6.9 6.8
 Hypoglycemia events
  Between 2.4 and 2.6 mmol/L 87 87 51 61
  Between 2.2 and 2.4 mmol/L 35 40 35 34
  Between 2.0 and 2.2 mmol/L 18 38 23 30
  <2.0 mmol/L 21 28 22 21
 Number of patients with no hypoglycemia 25 19 21 19
Per-patient results
 Number of hypoglycemic events 1 (0–3) 1 (0–4) 1 (0–3) 1 (0–3)
 Duration (% of data hypoglycemic) 0.1 (0.0–1.0) 0.5 (0.0–2.4) 0.5 (0.0–2.3) 0.6 (0.0–2.4)
 Hypoglycemic index (μmol/L) 2.1 (0.7–6.8) 0.8 (0.0–7.1) 0.5 (0.0–6.0) 3.9 (0.7–9.5)
Hypoglycemic state (no. of patients)
 Original hypoglycemia→hypoglycemia 24 22 23
 Original hypoglycemia→no hypoglycemia 1 3 2
 Originally no hypoglycemia→hypoglycemia 7 7 8
 Originally no hypoglycemia→no hypoglycemia 18 18 17

Data are median (interquartile range) values where applicable.

CGM, continuous glucose monitoring; ISIG, electrical current detected by the monitor from the sensor.