Table 3.
Study | Study group | Design | n | Regimen | Disease | POF (%) | Comments |
Falorio et al. (3) | GnRH-a | Retrospective | 61 | ABVD & alkylating containing regimes | HL | - | Recovery of normal menses in 92% regardless of front-line chemotherapy regimens |
Waxman et al.(28) | GnRH-a Control | Prospective, randomized | 8 | MVPP | LNH | 75 | Small sample size |
10 | 80 | ||||||
Blumenfeld et al.(29) | GnRH-a Control | Prospective, historical control group | 16 | Alkylating & non-alkylating containing regimens) | LNH | 6 | Longer follow-up in controls |
18 | 61 | ||||||
Dann et al. (30) | GnRH-a Control | Prospective, nonrandomized | 7 | Mega-CHOP | LNH | 0 | Small sample size, no statistical analysis |
6 | 16 | ||||||
Behringer et al.(27) | GnRH-a | Prospective randomized | Escalated BEACOPP | HL | - | This study was closed prematurely. Neither arm was able to ensure protection regarding FSH-based ovarian protection rates. | |
OC | |||||||
Blumenfeld et al.(26) | GnRH-a | Prospective study with historical controls | 65 | ABVD & procarbazine-containing regimens | HL | 3 | Not randomized. Effects probably only in younger patients < 37 years old |
Control | 46 | 63 | |||||
Huseret al.(31) | GnRH-a | Prospective case-control study | 72 | Alkylating & non-alkylating containing regimens) | HL | 71 | Reduction of ovarian failure risk in women with HL treated with less aggressive regimens plus a GnRH analogue |
Control | 45 | 20 |
ABVD: Doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine; BEACOPP: Bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisolone; MVPP: Mechlorethamine, vinblastine, procarbazine and prednisone; Mega-CHOP: Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone; GnRH-a: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs; OC: Oral contraceptives; HL: Hodgkin's lymphoma; NHL: Non-Hodgkin lymphoma