. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Jul 6;53(10):1084–1091. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02582.x

Table 2.

Hierarchical Regression Results for the Prediction of Maternal Harsh Negativity

	Step 1: Covariates	Step 2: Main effect	Step 3: Two-way	Step 4: Three-way
ΔF (df)	(5, 141) = 2.20⁺	(3, 138) = 13.12^***	(3, 135) = 2.25⁺	(1, 134) = 9.04^**
Δ Adj R²	.04	.20	.02	.04

Standardized regression weights:	β	β	β	β
Step 1: Site	−.02	−.08	−.05	−.09
SES	−.26^*	−.16	−.14	−.14
PPVT	.26^*	.34^***	.32^**	.34^***
Mother age	.17	.15	.13	.18
Child age	.04	.02	.05	.02
Step 2: Exec Function (EF)	---	−.03	.00	−.10
Conduct Probs (CP)	---	.35^***	.32^**	.29^**
Household Chaos	---	.23^**	.21^*	.25^*
Step 3:EF x CP	---	---	−.18^*	−.19^*
EF x Chaos	---	---	.02	−.08
CP x Chaos	---	---	.09	.13
Step 4: Chaos x EF x CP	---	---	---	.27^**

p < .05,

^**

p < .01,

^***

p < .001 (two-tailed).