Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 11;36(10):2147–2156. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1608-4

Table 3.

Comparison of different scores across ESWT and Fasciotomy groups in the different time periods

Baseline 3 weeks 12 weeks One year
Morning pain
 ESWT (n = 34) 71 (59-78) 40 (34.75-55.25) 30 (20-40.75)* 15 (5-25)
 Fasciotomy(n = 31) 68 (54-78) 41 (30-49) 30 (25-40)* 16 (11-25)
 P value .47 .45 .71 .20
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS) Pain score
 ESWT 0 (0- 0) 20 (0-30)* 30 (20-30)* 30 (27.5-40)*
 Fasciotomy 0 (0-20) 20 (0- 30) 30 (20-30) 30 (20- 30)
.62 .35 .40 .06
Activity limitation
 ESWT 4 (4 -7) 4 (4 -7) 5.5 (4 -7) 7 (4 -7)
 Fasciotomy 4 (4 -7) 4 (4 -7) 7 (4 -7) 7 (7 -10)
.57 .90 .91 .34
Maximum walking distance
 ESWT 4 (2- 4) 4 (4- 5) 4 (4- 5) 5 (4- 5)
 Fasciotomy 4 (2- 4) 4 (2- 4) 4 (4- 5) 5 (4- 5)
.79 .005* .49 .87
Walking surface
 ESWT 3 (3-5) 5 (3-5) 5 (3-5) 5 (5-5)
 Fasciotomy 3 (3-5) 5 (3-5) 5 (3-5) 5 (5-5)
.69 .75 .43 .79
Gait abnormality
 ESWT 4 (0- 4) 4 (4- 8) 8 (4- 8) 8 (7- 8)
 Fasciotomy 4 (0- 4) 4 (4- 4) 8 (4- 8) 8 (8- 8)
.16 .002* .82 .26
Sagital motion
 ESWT 8 (8-8) 8 (8-8) 8 (8-8) 8 (8-8)
 Fasciotomy 8 (8-8) 8 (8-8) 8 (8-8) 8 (8-8)
.61 .57 .57 .57
Hindfoot motion
 ESWT 6 (6-6) 6 (6-6) 6 (6-6) 6 (6-6)
 Fasciotomy 6 (6-6) 6 (6-6) 6 (6-6) 6 (6-6)
.61 .61 .61 .61
Ankle/hind foot instability
 ESWT 8 (8-8) 8 (8-8) 8 (8-8) 8 (8-8)
 Fasciotomy 8 (8-8) 8 (8-8) 8 (8-8) 8 (8-8)
.99 .99 .99 .99
Alignment
 ESWT 10 (10-10) 10 (10-10) 10 (10-10) 10 (10-10)
Fasciotomy 10 (10-10) 10 (10-10) 10 (10-10) 10 (10-10)
.50 .50 .50 .50
Total Score
 ESWT 43 (40 – 49) 70 (53.5 – 79) 80.5 (73 – 85) 87 (76.75 – 79)
 Fasciotomy 44 (42 – 65) 68 (65 –75) 77 (72 – 84) 86 (76 – 89)
.29 .59 .29 .27
Roles and Maudsely score
 ESWT 4 (4 – 4) 3 (2 – 3) 2(2– 3) 2 (1 – 3)
 Fasciotomy 4 (4 – 4) 3(2– 3) 2 (2 –3) 2 (1 – 2)
.99 .75 .23 .55
Success (Roles and Maudsley excellent and good results)
ESWT - 14 (41.2 %) 22 (64.7 %) 24 (70.6 %)
Fasciotomy - 10 (32.3 %) 16 (51.6 %) 24 (77.4 %)
.16 .11 .19

*Significant value